Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Section 271E

Latest Articles


Rationalization of Time limits to Impose Income Tax Penalties

Income Tax : Simplified penalty timelines under Section 275 effective April 2025, including changes in penalty powers, omissions, and clarifica...

March 5, 2025 621 Views 0 comment Print

Proposed Amendments to Penalty Provisions in Income Tax Act

Income Tax : Income Tax Act amendments propose penalties by Assessing Officers instead of Joint Commissioners. Omission of section 271BB and ch...

February 3, 2025 651 Views 0 comment Print

Penalties and Prosecutions Under Income tax Act, 1961

Income Tax : Discover penalties and prosecutions under the Income Tax Act, 1961, including default conditions, quantum of penalties, and potent...

September 6, 2024 507390 Views 4 comments Print

ITAT Upholds Penalty for Loan Repayment in Cash Despite Poor Cheque Clearance History

Income Tax : ITAT upholds penalty against taxpayer for cash repayment of loans, contravening Section 269T of Income-tax Act. Explore implicatio...

March 14, 2024 972 Views 0 comment Print

Legitimacy of repayments through Journal Entries – Whether liable to penalty?

Income Tax : Explore the impact of Income Tax Sections 269SS, 269ST, 269SU, and 269T on transactions via Journal/Book Entries. Learn about legi...

February 27, 2024 7632 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Section 271E penalty cannot survive if underlying assessment order annulled: SC

Income Tax : Supreme Court rules on penalty under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act in CIT vs. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills. Find out how assessment o...

February 14, 2025 609 Views 0 comment Print

Section 271D Penalty Invalid if AO fails to record satisfaction: Rajasthan HC

Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court quashes penalty proceedings under Section 271E of Income Tax Act citing lack of satisfaction recording in rea...

February 4, 2025 438 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty u/s. 271E in absence of any repayment of loan not leviable: ITAT Kolkata

Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held the penalty under section 271E of the Income Tax Act not leviable since in the present case there was no repayme...

December 26, 2024 297 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty u/s. 271C set aside as penalty order barred by limitation: Delhi HC

Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that reference by AO to JCIT regarding non-deduction of TDS was first step for initiation of action for impo...

November 20, 2024 735 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty order passed beyond time period framed u/s. 275(1)(c) untenable: Delhi HC

Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that passing of penalty order after the lapse of six months from the end of the month in which the penalty p...

November 18, 2024 633 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


Limitation for penalty proceedings U/s. 271D & 271E

Income Tax : It is a settled position that period of limitation of penalty proceedings under section 271D and 271E of the Act is governed by th...

April 26, 2016 7390 Views 0 comment Print

Limitation commencement for penalty proceedings U/s. 271D &271E

Income Tax : It has been brought to notice of CBDT that there are conflicting interpretations of various High Courts on the issue whether the l...

April 26, 2016 2818 Views 0 comment Print


Power of Commissioner to Reduce or Waive Income Tax Penalty

June 8, 2022 63022 Views 2 comments Print

In the tutorial on Penalties Under the Income-tax Act, we discussed various penalties imposable under the Income-tax Act in respect of various defaults. Apart from enacting penalty provisions

Penalties under Income-Tax Act, 1961

June 8, 2022 111595 Views 2 comments Print

Under the Income-tax Act, penalties are levied for various defaults committed by the taxpayer. Some of the penalties are mandatory and a few are at the discretion of the tax authorities. In this part, you can gain knowledge about the provisions relating to various penalties leviable under the Income-tax Act.

Section 271E penalty cannot be Levied in absence of Regular Assessment

May 11, 2022 1875 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty under Section 271E is not permissible in the absence of regular assessment framed against the assessee by the Revenue.

Loan Received/paid in cash to meet immediate business requirements – ITAT cancels section 271D/271E penalty

April 10, 2022 1008 Views 0 comment Print

Balwan Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee is engaged as a transporter and has not maintained any regular books of account. The assessment has been made on estimations, keeping in mind the transportation receipts earned by the assessee which also includes some of impugned entries towards cash receipts by way of loan. The assessee […]

ITAT deletes Section 271E penalty as assessee is deceased & authenticity of transaction cannot be vouched

April 3, 2022 846 Views 0 comment Print

Mohit Singh L/H of Late Shri Balwant Singh Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) As pointed out on behalf of the assessee, an assessment under Section 143(3) r.w. Section 147 was completed in the instant case, wherein the Assessing Officer has not observed any repayment of loan in cash as alleged in the penalty order. On perusal […]

No penalty for Acceptance and repayment of cash for personal purpose between near relatives

March 4, 2022 9630 Views 0 comment Print

Acceptance and repayment of cash for personal purpose between near relatives did not not attract sections 269SS and 269T and, therefore, no penalty could be levied under section 271D/271E.

No Section 271D/271E penalty merely for Squaring off loan transaction by Journal entries

December 28, 2021 4869 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs Macrotech Developers Ltd. (successor to M/s. Bellissimo Crown Buildmart Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) The ld. CIT(A) gave a categorical finding that the transactions carried out with the aforesaid three parties i.e. Jawala Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., Shreeniwas Cotton Mills Limited & Lodha Developers Private Limited, which are subject matter of levy of penalty […]

Section 271D & 271E Penalty proceedings are independent of assessment proceedings

September 20, 2021 7248 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty proceedings under section 271D or 271E were independent proceedings and had nothing to do with assessment proceedings or its outcome. Therefore, CIT(A) was not justified in cancelling the orders imposing penalty on the ground that the assessment proceedings, during the course of which, penalty u/s.271D and 271E were initiated had been held to be invalid.

Restrictions on Loans, Deposits & Advances- Section 269SS & 269T

November 23, 2020 16215 Views 0 comment Print

Analysis of Section 269SS of the Act This section was introduced in the Act with the objective that Unaccounted cash found in the course of searches carried out by the Income-tax Department is often explained by taxpayers as representing loans taken from or deposits made by various persons. Unaccounted income is also brought into the […]

Section 271E penalty cannot be imposed for Payment for purchases

October 13, 2020 2607 Views 0 comment Print

B. P. Patel and Co. Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is elementary to say that the ‘satisfaction’ can only be formed by the person who is competent to impose penalty and not a lower ranking authority. The law provides for imposition of penalty by an officer of the rank of the Joint Commissioner. Thus, the […]

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31