Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Topic Tag

#section 271(1)(c)

Latest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

1,727 articles
Income TaxSection 68 Addition Deleted in Search Case – No Incriminating Material Dumb Documents Rejected
Income Tax

Section 68 Addition Deleted in Search Case – No Incriminating Material Dumb Documents Rejected

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago
Income TaxPenalty U/s 271(1)(c) Deleted – Defective Notice Without Specifying Charge Vitiates Proceedings
Income Tax

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Deleted – Defective Notice Without Specifying Charge Vitiates Proceedings

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago
Income TaxForeign Tax Credit Allowed if Form 67 Filed Before Assessment Completion
Income Tax

Foreign Tax Credit Allowed if Form 67 Filed Before Assessment Completion

CA Sandeep Kanoi6 months ago
Income TaxIncome Tax Appeal Reinstated as Delay due to Bona Fide Belief & COVID-19 Disruption
Income Tax

Income Tax Appeal Reinstated as Delay due to Bona Fide Belief & COVID-19 Disruption

CA Sandeep Kanoi6 months ago
Income TaxITAT Deletes Penalty as Both Limbs of Section 271(1)(c) Invoked Together
Income Tax

ITAT Deletes Penalty as Both Limbs of Section 271(1)(c) Invoked Together

CA Sandeep Kanoi6 months ago
Income TaxPenalty Deleted as AO Failed to Specify Exact Section 271(1)(c) Charge: Delhi HC
Income Tax

Penalty Deleted as AO Failed to Specify Exact Section 271(1)(c) Charge: Delhi HC

CA Sandeep Kanoi6 months ago
Income TaxPenalty Quashed as Notice Failed to Specify Exact Section 271(1)(c) Charge: ITAT Raipur
Income Tax

Penalty Quashed as Notice Failed to Specify Exact Section 271(1)(c) Charge: ITAT Raipur

CA Sandeep Kanoi6 months ago
Income TaxNo Penalty on Estimated Bogus Purchases: ITAT Deletes U/s 271(1)(c) Levy
Income Tax

No Penalty on Estimated Bogus Purchases: ITAT Deletes U/s 271(1)(c) Levy

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago
Income TaxCommission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10%
Income Tax

Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10%

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago
Income TaxCIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld
Income Tax

CIT(A) Cannot Enhance on New Issue; JDA Additions & U/s 2(22)(e) Deletions Upheld

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago
Income TaxITAT Bangalore Quashes Sec 263 Revision: No Error in Valuation & No Need to Initiate Penalty
Income Tax

ITAT Bangalore Quashes Sec 263 Revision: No Error in Valuation & No Need to Initiate Penalty

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago
Income TaxTransfer of passive infrastructure assets to Vodafone Infrastructure was a ‘Gift’ eligible for sec 47(iii) exemption
Income Tax

Transfer of passive infrastructure assets to Vodafone Infrastructure was a ‘Gift’ eligible for sec 47(iii) exemption

RATHI6 months ago
Income TaxSection 271(1)(c) Penalty Deleted Due to Consistency with Earlier Year Ruling: ITAT Dehradun
Income Tax

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Deleted Due to Consistency with Earlier Year Ruling: ITAT Dehradun

CA Sandeep Kanoi6 months ago
Income TaxNo Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty
Income Tax

No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty

CA Vijayakumar Shetty6 months ago

Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.