#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

Without purchases there cannot be sales – Mumbai ITAT rejects 100% bogus purchase addition

Mumbai ITAT quashes reassessment for AY 2015-16 – AO’s “artificial inflation” of escaped income held legally unsustainable

No addition for “bogus purchases” when assessee already declared higher GP – Mumbai ITAT grants major relief to diamond trader

ITAT Deletes Section 271D Penalty as Cash Sale Consideration Is Not Covered by Section 269SS

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty deleted Due to Bona Fide Claim on Lease Premium Deduction

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Cannot Be Imposed for Valuation Differences Without Proof of Inaccuracy: SC

Income Tax: Madras HC Orders Fresh Review Due to Ignored Remand Report Evidence

SC Dismisses Penalty as Capital vs Revenue Receipt Issue Held Debatable

P&H HC Deleted Penalty as Subsidy Classification Held Debatable Issue

Bombay HC Quashes Section 270A Penalty Due to Absence of Under-Reported Income

ITAT Quashes Section 271(1)(c Penalty as Unsigned SCN Held Void in Law

Penalty U/s 270A Quashed – Failure to Specify ‘Misreporting Limb’ in Notice Held Fatal

Penalty on Share Premium Valuation Deleted – Bona Fide Claim Not Concealment

ITAT Mumbai: Penalty Not Automatic on Disallowances – Major Relief in Depreciation Expense Claims
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
