This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
When Quantum Dies, Penalty Dies – HC Appeal Without Stay Cannot Save Penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Lionbridge Technologies LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Lionbridge Technologies LLP Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
In revenue’s appeal u/s 271(1)(c), AO had levied penalty of Rs.6.92 crore after completing reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s.147 determining income at Rs.20.64 crore. Assessee succeeded before Tribunal in quantum proceedings in ITA No.610/Mum/2018 (order dated 27.05.2020), whereby entire addition was deleted & demand stood quashed.
CIT(A), relying on this binding Tribunal decision, deleted penalty since no addition survived. Revenue argued that quantum order has been challenged before Hon’ble Bombay HC & the penalty appeal should be kep...





