Income Tax : The Tribunal held that taxing total gross winnings without examining expenditure and loss components violates principles of fairne...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that additions under Section 69 cannot be sustained when based solely on third-party statements and unverified e...
Income Tax : ITAT held that a portion of cash paid could reasonably be sourced from accumulated withdrawals from joint bank accounts. The remai...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153C was invalid due to a defective and consolidated satisfaction ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that reassessment proceedings fail when the Assessing Officer abandons the issue forming the basis of reopening....
ITAT Ahmedabad clarifies that common area maintenance charges recovered from a sub-tenant, when reimbursed against actual expenses, are not rental income.
The Kolkata ITAT quashes a reassessment notice issued under Section 148, citing it was time-barred. The decision clarifies the application of TOLA and the new reassessment regime.
ITAT Chennai sets aside a best judgment assessment for a charitable trust, ordering a fresh hearing after noting prior Section 11 exemption and appellate procedural issues.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules a 29-day delay in filing Form 10DA is a procedural lapse, not a bar to claiming an 80JJAA deduction, overturning a ₹92.6 lakh disallowance.
Once assessee had filed the Return of Income, in response to notice, u/s 142(1), (although it was late), then it was mandatory for AO, in order to acquire the jurisdiction, to make the assessment on the assessee, to issue the notice u/s 143(2).
ITAT Nagpur held that co-operative society is eligible to claim deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act in respect of interest earned from credit facilities extended to nominal members. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Jaipur held that reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued by the Assessing Officer [AO], having no jurisdiction, is invalid. Accordingly, assessment order and consequent proceeding are also invalid.
ITAT Mumbai rules cash deposits in SBNs during demonetization, with explained sources, cannot be treated as unexplained income, citing judicial precedents.
ITAT Chennai holds reassessment notice under Section 148 for AY 2013–14 as time-barred, relying on Supreme Court’s ruling in Rajeev Bansal and other precedents.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes arbitrary disallowances under Section 40A(2)(b), emphasizing AO’s burden to prove excessiveness in related party transactions.
