Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharti Jayanti Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharti Jayanti Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) In Bharti Jayanti Jain vs ACIT (A.Ys. 2017-18 to 2019-20), additions were made u/s 69 based on alleged on-money payments for purchase of shops in a mall project, relying mainly on statements and excel data found during search in the Rubberwala Group. The assessee contended that no incriminating material was provided, no independent evidence existed, and opportunity for cross-examination was denied. The ITAT observed that the additions were solely based on third-party statements and electronic data recovered during search on another party, without any c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031