This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition U/s 69 for alleged on-money deleted – No corroborative evidence denial of cross-examination violates natural justice – ITAT Mumbai
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bharti Jayanti Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Bharti Jayanti Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
In Bharti Jayanti Jain vs ACIT (A.Ys. 2017-18 to 2019-20), additions were made u/s 69 based on alleged on-money payments for purchase of shops in a mall project, relying mainly on statements and excel data found during search in the Rubberwala Group. The assessee contended that no incriminating material was provided, no independent evidence existed, and opportunity for cross-examination was denied.
The ITAT observed that the additions were solely based on third-party statements and electronic data recovered during search on another par...
Author Info
