Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax Reopening Merely for Verification Invalid; Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue SLP Income Tax Reopening Merely to Verify Documents Without Reason to Believe Invalid: Bombay HC Corporate Law Audit Objection Cannot Reopen Assessment on Issues Already Examined by AO: Bombay HC Income Tax Addition Beyond Limited Scrutiny Scope Without Prior Approval Unsustainable: ITAT Delhi Income Tax ₹2.48 Crore Section 68 Addition Deleted as Bank Credits From Money Transfer Business Explained: ITAT Mumbai Income Tax Excess Stock Forming Part of Business Stock Cannot Be Treated as Section 69 Income: Andhra Pradesh HC Income Tax Section 115BBE Not Applicable When Excess Stock Is Traceable to Business Income: ITAT Chandigarh Income Tax Section 271AAB Penalty Notice Must Specify Applicable Limb: ITAT Chennai
Topic Tag

#section 17

Every article filed under the “section 17” tag — analysis, news and updates.

256 articles
Company LawCIRP against Falcon Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. admitted as debt and default established
Company Law

CIRP against Falcon Auto Engineering Pvt. Ltd. admitted as debt and default established

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Company LawApplication u/s. 9 of IBC for CIRP against OSSL Agri Logistics Pvt. Ltd. admitted
Company Law

Application u/s. 9 of IBC for CIRP against OSSL Agri Logistics Pvt. Ltd. admitted

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawCIRP against Gupta Power Infrastructure Ltd. admitted as default of Rs. 2888 crore proved
Corporate Law

CIRP against Gupta Power Infrastructure Ltd. admitted as default of Rs. 2888 crore proved

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Custom DutyDGCEI appointed as officer of Customs hence authorize to demand differential duty u/s. 28
Custom Duty

DGCEI appointed as officer of Customs hence authorize to demand differential duty u/s. 28

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawHC allowed delay of 255 days in claim by EPFO as Provident Fund dues were excluded from liquidation estate of a company
Corporate Law

HC allowed delay of 255 days in claim by EPFO as Provident Fund dues were excluded from liquidation estate of a company

RATHI12 months ago
Corporate LawRetention of seized property not justified as procedure u/s. 20 of PMLA not followed
Corporate Law

Retention of seized property not justified as procedure u/s. 20 of PMLA not followed

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawNo mandate to include borrower and guarantor in Expression Parties u/r 8(8) of SARFAESI Act
Corporate Law

No mandate to include borrower and guarantor in Expression Parties u/r 8(8) of SARFAESI Act

RATHI12 months ago
Corporate LawRetention of seized property without adhering to section 20 of PMLA is unlawful
Corporate Law

Retention of seized property without adhering to section 20 of PMLA is unlawful

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Corporate LawResolution plan rightly not approved since deed claimed by Corporate Debtor is unenforceable
Corporate Law

Resolution plan rightly not approved since deed claimed by Corporate Debtor is unenforceable

POONAM GANDHI12 months ago
Company LawCIRP admitted as there is default in repayment of debt and application u/s. 10 is complete
Company Law

CIRP admitted as there is default in repayment of debt and application u/s. 10 is complete

POONAM GANDHI1 year ago
Company LawCIRP u/s. 7 of IBC against Filoura Big Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd. admitted
Company Law

CIRP u/s. 7 of IBC against Filoura Big Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd. admitted

POONAM GANDHI1 year ago
Corporate LawAdmission of application u/s 7 of Code as default in repayment of financial debt exceeding threshold established
Corporate Law

Admission of application u/s 7 of Code as default in repayment of financial debt exceeding threshold established

RATHI1 year ago
Income TaxExecution of Joint Development Agreement doesn’t constitute transfer of capital asset
Income Tax

Execution of Joint Development Agreement doesn’t constitute transfer of capital asset

POONAM GANDHI1 year ago
Company LawWorkmen not worked after layoff notice are not entitled for wages of that period
Company Law

Workmen not worked after layoff notice are not entitled for wages of that period

POONAM GANDHI1 year ago