Income Tax : Dive into the Principle of Mutuality, exploring its meaning, tax implications, and impact on cooperative societies. Discover case ...
Fema / RBI : It is felt that enormous powers are conferred on Banks or Public Financial Institutions under SARFAESI Act, 2002 from the stage of...
Finance : I strongly believe that implementing the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 making a good balance between the object and the int...
Goods and Services Tax : Levy of sales tax on a higher percentage on ‘superior kerosene oil' (SKO) (also called white kerosene oil) and also levy of resa...
Income Tax : For the sake of convenience, the attached tables summarises the valuation rules for all perquisites prescribed in the new rule 3 e...
Income Tax : A dozen private nursing homes and hospitals today lost their approval granted under Section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act on the bas...
Income Tax : The case examined whether compensation paid to exit prior agreements was a sham arrangement. The Tribunal ruled it was a valid bus...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that negligence on part of bank in presentation of cheque within the validity period of cheque leads to ‘defi...
Company Law : Bombay High Court held that writ petition cannot be entertained in the face of availability of alternative remedy of approaching t...
Income Tax : In the absence of proper compliance with Section 65B and failure to establish a clear chain of custody, the digital evidence relie...
Corporate Law : The court analysed whether the reason account blocked falls within the scope of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. It ...
Income Tax : Circular No. 2/2010-Income Tax The Finance Act, 2005 introduced a levy namely Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) on the value of certain fr...
Income Tax : Notification No. 94/2009 - Income Tax For the purpose of computing the income chargeable under the head Salaries, the value of pe...
The writ petitioners challenged the public auction notice before the D.R.T under section 17 which was ultimately dismissed for non-prosecution. In the year 2007, due to devastating flood, all the costly machines were defunct.
Delhi High Court held that retention of seized property without adhering to section 20 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA] is contrary to statutory framework and accordingly unsustainable in law. Hence, present appeal is allowed and order set aside.
NCLAT Delhi held that order of Adjudicating Authority refusing approval of resolution plan justified since deed claimed by Corporate Debtor is doubtful and questionable and accordingly, asset cannot be treated as asset of Corporate Debtor.
NCLT Chennai held that application u/s. 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code admitted for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Corporate Applicant since there is a default in the repayment of debt and the petition filed u/s. 10 is complete.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] filed by Vrushvik Entertainment Private Limited (Financial Creditor) for initiation of CIRP against Filoura Big Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd., (Corporate Debtor) admitted as debt and default proved.
In the instant case, a Financial Creditor was an NBFC engaged in the business of providing finance to a wide range of customers including small and medium enterprises. The Corporate Debtor carried on the business as a dealer and manufacturer in automobiles, automobile spare parts and components etc.
ITAT Chandigarh held that execution of Joint Development Agreement [JDA] doesn’t constitute transfer of capital asset which would result in earning of capital gain. Accordingly, addition is deleted and appeal is allowed.
NCLAT Delhi held that claim of wages and salaries after the issuance of the layoff notice rightly rejected since the appellant workmen due to issuance of the layoff notice has not worked after issuance of this layoff notice. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
The case of assessee was that the assessments for these years were time-barred. It was urged that in view of the limitation prescribed under Section 19 of the Act, the authority concerned initially declared the assessments for all the years to be time-barred.
The ITAT Bangalore ruled in Ramesh Kumar vs. ACIT that capital gains tax can’t be levied based on mere possession, a commencement certificate, and an unregistered Power of Attorney.
