Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Kumar Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Mere Possession & Construction Activity Doesn’t Trigger Capital Gains u/s 2(47)(v)- Capital Gains Can’t Be Taxed Without Registered Sale Agreement: Relief to Landowner; No Registered Contract, No Transfer: ITAT Deletes ₹30 Crore Capital Gains Addition- POA Is Not Conveyance – ITAT Bangalore Applies Balbir Singh Maini & Favors Assessee Background Assessee, , faced addition of capital gains for AY 2012-13 on account of a transaction with Mr. Srinath Hebbar (Land Traders) regarding property in Kadri, Mangalore. AO, relying on survey findi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930