Income Tax : A detailed overview of limitation periods prescribed under the Income-tax Act reveals how missing statutory deadlines can lead to ...
Income Tax : Understand what belated ITR filing is in 2025, including deadlines, late fees under Section 234F, and the loss of tax benefits lik...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance of agricultural expenses based on estimation is unsustainable without concrete evidence, rul...
Income Tax : Understand Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, its implications on return filing due dates, and the changes for FY 2023-24. Learn a...
Income Tax : Understand the concept of Updated Return under the Income-tax Act, its necessity, tax implications, and filing process. Get insigh...
Income Tax : The Court quashed criminal proceedings after finding that the petitioner had ceased to be a director before the due date for filin...
Income Tax : The Bangalore ITAT held that Section 54 relief cannot be denied when capital gains are invested in a new residential house before ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that entries found in third-party ERP software during a search cannot alone justify unexplained investment addit...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT held that no further profits can be attributed to a DAPE once the Indian agent is remunerated at arm’s length for al...
Income Tax : The Court held that rejecting condonation solely because the assessment year was not mentioned in the circular is unjustified. It ...
Income Tax : The due date of furnishing of Return of Income for the Assessment Year 2021-22, which is 31st July 2021 under sub-section (1) of s...
Income Tax : CBDT hereby authorises the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC) having her / his headqua...
ITAT Delhi held that it is proved that assessee doesn’t have any permanent establishment in India, during the year under consideration, accordingly, receipts classifiable as business income cannot be taxed in India.
ITAT Raipur held that belated return of income filed by payee u/s. 139(4) satisfies the 1st proviso to section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act hence assessee cannot be treated as ‘assessee in default’.
ITAT Bangalore held that as per provisions of section 44AA of the Income Tax Act, an agriculturist is not required to maintain books of accounts. Further, revenue has failed to establish anything contrary, accordingly, addition made on this count deleted.
ITAT Bangalore held that both AO and First Appellate Authority failed to conduct examination of cash deposit during demonetisation period in the light of CBDT instructions and hence matter remanded to that extent.
ITAT Raipur held that CIT(A) deleted the addition towards unexplained cash under section 68 of the Income Tax Act without proper verification of the facts and evidences and thus the matter restored back to the file of AO for adequate verifications.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act towards Long Term Capital Gains admissible even when return is filed belated return of income under section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act.
Calcutta High Court affirms ITAT’s decision to grant relief to Camellia Educare Trust despite late submission of the audit report for AY 2020-21.
ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance of agricultural expenses based on estimation is unsustainable without concrete evidence, ruling in favor of A.S. Srinath (HUF).
Understand Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, its implications on return filing due dates, and the changes for FY 2023-24. Learn about new dates, old regime, and key considerations.
In Vinayagam Sabarisanthanakrishnan Vs ACIT, Madras HC clarifies that failure to file returns under Sec 139(1) is essential for prosecution under Sec 276CC of the Income Tax Act.
