Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Rahul Kumar Jain (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO Vs Rahul Kumar Jain (ITAT Raipur)

ITAT Raipur held that CIT(A) deleted the addition towards unexplained cash under section 68 of the Income Tax Act without proper verification of the facts and evidences and thus the matter restored back to the file of AO for adequate verifications.

Facts- Subsequent to processed u/s 143(1), it is noticed by the revenue that the assessee has sold an urban land and have received the consideration to the turn of Rs. 20,00,000/-, jointly with Shri Raja Vikram. Assessee’s share in the consideration was Rs. 10,00,000/-. It w

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031