Income Tax : The ruling clarifies that unauthenticated digital chats and screenshots cannot form the sole basis of tax additions without proper...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : Section 270A penalties must specify the exact misreporting clause. Vague notices invalidate penalties and can restore immunity und...
Income Tax : Understand the three core processes of Indian Income Tax: Rectification of mistakes (Sec 154), the four types of Assessment (Summa...
Income Tax : Understand your legal rights and procedural protections during Income Tax and PMLA raids in India. Learn what to do and what to a...
CA, CS, CMA : Legal opinion sought by NFRA on auditing standards, penalties, and regulatory roles in India. Analysis of NFRA’s powers under th...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance reports the arrest of a firm's finance head for GST evasion worth Rs 88 crore. Learn about the case and it...
Income Tax : The Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT) has directed re-opening of all cases under the search and seizure label, income-escapin...
Income Tax : The ITAT Ahmedabad held that isolated WhatsApp messages and electronic communications cannot, by themselves, support additions in ...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that penalty under Section 43 of the Black Money Act could not be imposed when foreign assets were subsequentl...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad Bench emphasized that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed solely because an addition survives appellat...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that Section 263 cannot be invoked where the assessee never claimed the alleged expenditure as a deduction. With...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that proportionate interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii) cannot be sustained when the assessee has ade...
Income Tax : Read the order issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Ministry of Finance, specifying the scope of the e-Appeals Sche...
Income Tax : Dispute arose between the Department and the assessees with regard to adjustment of such seized/requisitioned cash against advance...
Discover Mumbai ITAT order on Capacite Infra Projects Ltd Vs DCIT, analyzing disallowance of non-genuine/Bogus purchases and its implications on tax assessment.
In the case of Mandeep Singh Anand Vs ACIT, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi ruled that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot add a new source of income without issuing an enhancement notice. Get insights into the case and the tribunal’s decision.
ITAT Chandigarh held that excess stock found during the course of survey cannot be brought to tax under the deeming provisions of section 69B of the Income Tax Act as the same is undeclared business income and not unexplained investment.
Read the ITAT Delhi’s decision in Mudita Chaturvedi Vs ACIT case, where the addition of jewellery under section 69 is deleted, citing it as Stri Dhan from parents.
ITAT Delhi in Feather Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT held that Section 68 is inapplicable to expenditure as same applies to credit in books of account
Mumbai ITAT rules that a retracted statement without nexus to the taxpayer cannot justify addition under Sec 69A, offering relief to the appellant in Mayur Kanjibhai Shah Vs ITO.
DCIT Vs Delight Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. case by ITAT Kolkata, where currency derivative loss was deemed genuine and safe harbour rule of 5% under Section 50C was allowed.
ITAT Delhi’s order on Trident Towers Pvt. Ltd vs ACIT addresses the deletion of addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, citing submission of requisite documents.
ITAT Delhi held that in absence of mentioning the date of handing over of material, date of satisfaction note shall be considered for the purpose of assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Act and completion of assessment thereafter.
ITAT Delhi held that genuineness and veracity of the party cannot be doubted merely because the cold storage rent was received in cash. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained investment unjustified.
