Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitutional validity of Anti-Profiteering provisions under GST, their impact on businesses and consumers, and the l...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the sunset of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST and its logical end. Learn about its functions, mer...
Goods and Services Tax : Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contra...
Goods and Services Tax : The Hon’ble National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), in the case of DGAP vs. Hardcastle Restaurants [Case No. 79/2020 dated D...
Goods and Services Tax : D.S. Brothers Vs Durga Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) GST Profiteering of Rs. 1,57,200 established in the case of supply of Duracell Ba...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic ...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
Goods and Services Tax : Analysis of the Principal Commissioner vs Ranga 70 MM case, involving anti-profiteering issues in GST reduction for cinema ticket ...
Goods and Services Tax : Telangana HC upheld Sudarshan Theatre's violation of CGST Section 171 for delayed ticket price reduction after GST rate cut, dismi...
Goods and Services Tax : The CCI investigated Baxium Health Science for failing to pass on GST reductions. Detailed findings highlight discrepancies in pro...
Goods and Services Tax : CCI examines whether Nirma Ltd. complied with GST tax rate reductions, addressing the legal and economic implications of alleged a...
Goods and Services Tax : CCI finds no profiteering by Swastik Harmony Developers in Jainil Mehta GST complaint. Case dropped due to lack of evidence under ...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Goods and Services Tax : I have been further directed to request you to take all possible steps envisaged under the GST Laws to ensure that the legislative...
Goods and Services Tax : Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pend...
Sh. Deepak Garg Vs JKG Construction Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The present Report dated 31.08.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the […]
Janki Prasad Pandey Vs Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board (NAA) The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 16.12.2020 under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant […]
Sh. Parvez Khan Vs Pearlite Real Properties Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) It has been revealed from the DGAP’s Report that the ITC as a percentage of the turnover that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 to June-2017) was 3.02% and during the post-GST period (July-2017 to December-2018), it was 6.66% for the […]
Rajesh Shaw Vs Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Applicant No.1 Rajesh Shaw alleged that the Respondent No. 1 Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and charged GST @12% on the amount due to him against payments made for […]
Kundan Kumar Sinha Vs ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged profiteering by ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. in respect of purchase of a Flat No. 4032 in Tower-4 in the Respondent’s project ‘ATS Rhapsody’, situated at Plot No. GH12/1, Sector-1, Village Bisrakh, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent had not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs ATS Homes Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the present case, are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 15.10.2020 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax […]
Sh. Nitin Kumar Joshi Vs GK ARPL Ventures (NAA) In the instant case, there is no reduction of rate of tax during the relevant period and the only issue which is required to be decided by the Authority as to whether Respondent is required to pass on the benefit of Input Tax Credit. As mentioned […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs J.P. and Sons (NAA) NAA has observed that the Respondent, M/s J.P. and Sons was a distributor of M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. The Authority finds that M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. was investigated by the DGAP for allegations of profiteering is as much he has not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA) There is no dispute with regard to the reduction of the tax in respect of subject products supplied by the Respondent with effect from 15-11-2017. The Government by Notification No 41/2017-CT (Rate) dated 14-11-2017 has reduced rates on subject products. In view of the above said […]
Sh. Sumit Mansingka Vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Respondent E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has made his detailed submissions regarding the fact that the credit of VAT for pre-GST era has been denied to him. He has also submitted copies of VAT returns and the UPVAT assessment orders for the relevant period in this regard. The […]
