Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitutional validity of Anti-Profiteering provisions under GST, their impact on businesses and consumers, and the l...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the sunset of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST and its logical end. Learn about its functions, mer...
Goods and Services Tax : Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contra...
Goods and Services Tax : The Hon’ble National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), in the case of DGAP vs. Hardcastle Restaurants [Case No. 79/2020 dated D...
Goods and Services Tax : D.S. Brothers Vs Durga Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) GST Profiteering of Rs. 1,57,200 established in the case of supply of Duracell Ba...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic ...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that maintaining ticket prices by increasing base price after GST reduction violated Section 171. It directed de...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed increased ITC benefits post-GST without corresponding price reduction. The tribunal ruled this violated Section...
Goods and Services Tax : The case examined whether GST rate cuts were passed on to consumers. The authority held that increasing base prices instead of red...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that although profiteering of ₹1.70 crore was computed, the developer had passed on ₹2.02 crore to home-buyers. Wit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report finding no extra ITC benefit after GST implementation and held that Section 171 was not viol...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Goods and Services Tax : I have been further directed to request you to take all possible steps envisaged under the GST Laws to ensure that the legislative...
Goods and Services Tax : Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pend...
Varun Goel Vs Town Park Buildcon Private Ltd. (NAA) a. The Respondent vide his submissions dated 05.04.2022 has contended that the DGAP has not incorporated the ITC of VAT in the pre-GST period for the computation of profiteering which ought to have been done. He has further submitted before this Authority that the said ITC […]
NAA held that ITC benefit of Rs. 16,49,897/- was required to be passed on to 39 flat buyers by SSBC Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
Nilang Shastri Vs Swati Realty (NAA) Applicant alleged profiteering by Respondent Swati Realty in respect of purchase of a Flat in the Respondent’s project –Swati Florence, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. The Applicant has alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in price after the implementation […]
Since the registration was obtained for the subject projects post the introduction of Goods and Services Tax only, the provisions of Section 171 dealing with Anti-profiteering could not be made applicable to the said projects in the view of the fact that there was no additional ITC that had been made available to the Respondent,
NAA held that Jay Cee Chemists did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Napkin’s amounting to Rs. 2048 to Customers.
Rajeev Goyal Vs Prateek Infra Projects India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that the Applicant No. 1 has alleged fraud and forgery on the part of the Respondent and fault in calculations of the profiteered amount, saleable area and the total turnover of the Respondent by the DGAP for the Project Prateek Edifice. The […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Elan Ltd. (NAA) DGAP has carefully examined the Report of the DGAP and it has been observed that as per the Table ‘A’ of the Report all the relevant events for the project ‘Epic‘ took place in GST regime and the Respondent had not availed any CENVAT/ITC, related to ‘EPIC’ […]
NAA held that Sanghvi Premises Pvt. Ltd. has not passed ITC benefit to Its customers in its Project ‘Sanghvi Solitaire’ situated at Borivali
Ajay Sood Vs Eldeco County Ltd. (NAA) Authority finds that the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit of 1.24 % of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent for the project Eldeco County. This benefit was required to be passed on to the recipients. Thus, Section 171 of the CGST, 2017 has been contravened by […]
Manju Bala Vs SJP Hotel and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The only plea of the Respondent before this Authority is that he has passed on the benefit of ITC amounting to Rs 9,77,49,000/- to all his customers and has submitted sample acknowledgement receipts claimed to have been received from the customers vide which, according to […]
