Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitutional validity of Anti-Profiteering provisions under GST, their impact on businesses and consumers, and the l...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the sunset of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST and its logical end. Learn about its functions, mer...
Goods and Services Tax : Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contra...
Goods and Services Tax : The Hon’ble National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), in the case of DGAP vs. Hardcastle Restaurants [Case No. 79/2020 dated D...
Goods and Services Tax : D.S. Brothers Vs Durga Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) GST Profiteering of Rs. 1,57,200 established in the case of supply of Duracell Ba...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic ...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that maintaining ticket prices by increasing base price after GST reduction violated Section 171. It directed de...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed increased ITC benefits post-GST without corresponding price reduction. The tribunal ruled this violated Section...
Goods and Services Tax : The case examined whether GST rate cuts were passed on to consumers. The authority held that increasing base prices instead of red...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that although profiteering of ₹1.70 crore was computed, the developer had passed on ₹2.02 crore to home-buyers. Wit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report finding no extra ITC benefit after GST implementation and held that Section 171 was not viol...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Goods and Services Tax : I have been further directed to request you to take all possible steps envisaged under the GST Laws to ensure that the legislative...
Goods and Services Tax : Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pend...
Vijay Pal Sing Vs Nandi Infratech Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority determines an amount or Rs. 7,28,05,691/- (including 12% GST) under section 133(1) as the profiteered amount by the Respondent from his 768 home buyers/shop buyers/customers which shall be refunded by him along with interest @18% thereon, from the date when the above amount was […]
Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of DTH (Direct to flume) Service supplied by the Respondent vide subscription ID No. 1088222136 in respect of payment of half yearly/annual subscription charges.
Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent has not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price on purchase of Apartment No. 503, Tower-E, from the Respondent in the Project Panchshil Towers situated at Kharadi, Pune on the introduction of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017, in terms of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Dr. Rahul Bamal Vs SVP Builders India Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the case was that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules. 2017, by the Applicant no. 1, wherein it had been alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit […]
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Friends Land Developers (NAA) The present Report dated 01.07.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that this Authority, vide Order No. 62/2019 dated 27.11.2019, […]
NAA held that distributor of products manufactured by others also liable to pass on the benefit of tax rate reduction to the recipients
Meenal Gupta Vs Kanakia Spaces Reality Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The present Report dated 31.08.2020 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rue 129 (8) of the Coning Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 In pursuance of Authority’s Interim Order no.15/2019 dated 19.11 […]
Milan Pankaj Kothari Vs Sri Dutt Constructions (NAA) The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Maharashtra State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of a Flat No. […]
Applicant alleged that JM Lingamaneni Township not passed ITC benefit of by way of reduction in price in respect of project ‘Raintree Park’.
Saurabh Kumar Vs Pareena Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit or Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of flat in respect of purchase of flat in project “Laxmi Apartment” Sector-99A, Dwarka Expressway, Gurugram, Haryana. It is clear from […]
