Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitutional validity of Anti-Profiteering provisions under GST, their impact on businesses and consumers, and the l...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the sunset of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST and its logical end. Learn about its functions, mer...
Goods and Services Tax : Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contra...
Goods and Services Tax : The Hon’ble National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), in the case of DGAP vs. Hardcastle Restaurants [Case No. 79/2020 dated D...
Goods and Services Tax : D.S. Brothers Vs Durga Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) GST Profiteering of Rs. 1,57,200 established in the case of supply of Duracell Ba...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic ...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that maintaining ticket prices by increasing base price after GST reduction violated Section 171. It directed de...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed increased ITC benefits post-GST without corresponding price reduction. The tribunal ruled this violated Section...
Goods and Services Tax : The case examined whether GST rate cuts were passed on to consumers. The authority held that increasing base prices instead of red...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that although profiteering of ₹1.70 crore was computed, the developer had passed on ₹2.02 crore to home-buyers. Wit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal accepted the DGAP report finding no extra ITC benefit after GST implementation and held that Section 171 was not viol...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Goods and Services Tax : I have been further directed to request you to take all possible steps envisaged under the GST Laws to ensure that the legislative...
Goods and Services Tax : Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pend...
Mahendra Kishanlal Prajapati Vs Vishwanath Builders (NAA) The Authority finds that the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit of 3.75% of the turnover has accrued to the Respondent for the project ‘Sarathya’. This benefit was required to be passed on to the recipients. Thus, Section 171 of the CGST, 2017 has been contravened by the […]
Sunil Saraf Vs Paramount Propbuild Pvt Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the present case was that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering to the DGAP for conducting a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase […]
Complaint alleged that New World Realty LLP had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices after implementation of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017 in respect of Tinsel Town Project, Pune
NAA held that Pareena Infrastructure not passed ITC benefit by way of commensurate reduction in price of flat for project Laxmi Apartment
Sh. Hasmukh Daftary Vs K D Lite Developers Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the present case are that Applicant No. 1 had filed an Application before the Standing Committee stating that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of Flat […]
Applicant alleged profiteering by Ramprastha Promoter & Developer Pvt. Ltd in its project ‘Rise’, Ramprastha City, Sector-37D, Gurugram.
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Elan Ltd. (NAA) The Authority has carefully examined the Report of the DGAP and it has been observed that the relevant events for the project Epic took place in GST regime and the Respondent had not availed any CENVAT/ITC, related to ‘EPIC’ project, in pre-GST regime and that the Respondent […]
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Dange Enterprises (NAA) Authority also find that after the closure of the hearing, Respondent vide his email dated 13.06.2022 has stated that he has agreed to submit the requisite data in the prescribed format as required by the DGAP for the entire period of investigation. In the given situation, as narrated […]
Sh. Deepak Naik Vs Prestige Estates Projects Ltd. (NAA) Authority funds that the Respondent has gained the benefit of ITC on the supply of Construction Services after the implementation of GST w.e.f 01.07.2017 and the Respondent was required to pass on such benefit of ITC to the homebuyers/customers by way of commensurate reduction in prices […]
Anti-Profiteering Provisions of Section 171 of CGST Act, 2017 violated by Respondent, yet provisions of IBC, 2016 will nonetheless prevail.
