Sabka Vishwas - (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019
Service Tax : SC held that assessee cannot be denied relief under SVLDR Scheme for not making payment of dues in prescribed time limit due to in...
Excise Duty : M/s. UCN Cable Network (P) Ltd. Vs. Designated Committee under SVLDR Scheme, 2019 (Bombay High Court, Nagpur) Completion Of Invest...
Finance : Cases involving confiscation/ redemption fine are within the ambit of Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLD...
Income Tax : THE INTRODUCTION TO THE SCENARIO The fostering of the economic growth and development have been assured and accounted in the hands...
Excise Duty : Memorandum seeking a special measure for the opening of Limited Time Window to process of Payment of Taxes under Sabka Vishwas - (...
Income Tax : The updated return facility encourages voluntary tax compliance, allowing taxpayers to correct income omissions. Proposal to exten...
Excise Duty : As we all are aware that, SVLDRS was introduced with the twin objectives- First, finalize the legacy disputes in Central Excise ...
Excise Duty : Sabka Vishwas – Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme The details of total amount of funds that are locked up in cases at various q...
Excise Duty : Keeping in view the response of the taxpayers to the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, the Central Government toda...
Excise Duty : Directorate General of Taxpayer Services, Mumbai Zonal Unit, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs organized a Symposium on ...
Service Tax : Gujarat High Court held SVLDRS relief unavailable as service tax was not quantified before 30 June 2019. Partial admission during ...
Service Tax : CESTAT held SVLDRS benefits lapsed as payment was made after the extended deadline. Service tax and interest were upheld, but pena...
Service Tax : The issue was rejection of a declaration under the dispute resolution scheme citing lack of quantification. The Court held that li...
Excise Duty : The Court directed authorities to reconsider the petitioner’s application under the scheme. It noted that a co-noticee had alrea...
Service Tax : The Court held that payments cannot be denied credit merely because they were recorded under different accounting heads. It ruled ...
Excise Duty : CBIC-6/1 /2021 -CX-VI Section-CBEC Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Tax &am...
Excise Duty : In cases where assessee has filed ST-3 return on or before 30.6.2019 and has paid the tax dues in full before filing application, ...
Excise Duty : CBIC instruction on Manual processing of declarations filed by the co-noticees under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Sch...
Excise Duty : Manual processing of declaration filed under SVLDRS, 2019 in order to comply with the directions of the Hon'ble High Courts to the...
Excise Duty : Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (Removal of Difficulties) order 2020 dated 13th Nov.,2020- procedure for fi...
Jagadish Advertising Vs Designated Committee (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner in this petition has sought for quashing of the statement issued by the Designated Committee in Form Nos. SVLDRS-2 & SVLDRS-3 and is seeking for a direction to the Designated Committee to accept the declaration made by him in Form No.SVLDRS- 1 as final. In […]
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 – A scheme which was intended to substantially scale down pending litigations under IDT, led to litigation of its own Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 announced as Dispute Resolution cum Amnesty Scheme by Hon’ble Finance Minister, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman on 05 July 2019 and inculcated in […]
Seventh Plane Network Private ltd. Vs. Union of India & ORS. ( Delhi High Court) The issue under consideration is whether the petitioner was eligible to apply under the SVLDRS, 2019 even if the amount of duty involved in the audit had not been quantified before 30th June, 2019? High Court states that, the audit […]
whether application filed under the SVLDR Scheme rejected on the sole ground that the demand was neither quantified without giving opportunity of being heard is justified in law?
the objective of the Dispute Resolution Scheme is to reduce legacy tax disputes and therefore, fairness should be there while interpreting the provisions of the scheme.
As per the data consolidated on the basis of the report received from DG (Systems) and the Zonal Chief Commissioners of CGST & CX, (copy enclosed), it is revealed that an amount of Rs. 3972.01 crores in respect of 23,781 ARNs is pending realisation as on 01.07.2020
HC granted Fresh Hearing for the Taxpayer who are Unable to Attend the Hearing due to Lockdown
whether the rejection of petitioner’s application under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Form No. SVLDRS-3 in respect of central excise duty payable is justified by law?
These rules may be called the Sabka Vishwas (legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme (Amendment) Rules, 2020. They shall come into force from the date of their publication in the official gazette.
Issue under consideration is whether rejection of benefit under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 merely for mistake in Form SVLDRS-1 is justified in law?
