Case Law Details
Hitech Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
In the present case, the petitioner doesn’t get fair opportunity of being heard to present his point of view due to lockdown. The show-cause notice also proposed to impose a penalty on one of the partners of the firm under Rule 26 of the Rules.
Hence High Court states that the impugned communication in Form SVLDRS-3 is hereby quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted to the respondent No.3 herein i.e. the Designated Committee, Ahmedabad-South for fresh hearing on the issues in question. The respondent No.3 shall fix a particular date of personal hearing and intimate the same in writing to the writ applicants. The writ applicants upon receipt of such intimation shall appear before the respondent No.3 and make their submissions. Thereafter, the respondent No.3 shall pass a fresh order in accordance with law.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT
1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
