Corporate Law : Insights into recent Supreme Court and High Court judgments on IBC cases, covering corporate guarantees, auction timelines, liquid...
CA, CS, CMA : Review of recent notifications and circulars for Income Tax, GST, SEBI, and IBBI from November 4-10, 2024, covering updated polici...
CA, CS, CMA : Overview of recent notifications and circulars from Income Tax, GST, Customs, and IBBI for the week of October 14-20, 2024, impact...
CA, CS, CMA : Discover recent Income Tax and GST notifications and circulars issued during the week of October 14-20, 2024, focusing on key exem...
Corporate Law : Despite Supreme Court rulings, authorities continue to raise demands for periods before NCLT orders under IBC, violating judicial ...
Corporate Law : IBBI dismisses multiple RTI appeals citing misuse of the RTI Act through repetitive filings. The order emphasizes responsible use ...
Corporate Law : RTI Act permits access only to information held by a public authority and does not require the creation or interpretation of infor...
Corporate Law : IBBI denies RTI appeal citing fiduciary exemption under Section 8(1)(e). The requested MSME-related information was withheld. Appe...
Corporate Law : IBBI proposes key amendments to CIRP, liquidation, and personal guarantor insolvency, aiming to enhance efficiency, transparency, ...
Corporate Law : IBBI revises technical standards for information utilities under the Insolvency Code, effective January 2025, focusing on user ide...
Company Law : NCLAT Chennai held that order not falling under Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] is not appealable under ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Chennai held that liquidator cannot resort to proceedings under section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for the purpos...
Corporate Law : NCLT Mumbai held that entertaining objection raised by the applicant after the sale is confirmed unjustified as there is no allega...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court rules on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India's circular regarding liquidation fees, clarifying IP's...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC rules on Sundaresh Bhat vs IBBI, emphasizing ethical conduct and fairness for liquidators under IBC. Key insights into th...
Corporate Law : IBBI rejects RTI appeal seeking detailed breakup of Dalmia Cement claims in Jaiprakash insolvency case, citing unavailability of d...
Corporate Law : IBBI rejects RTI appeal seeking clarifications on valuer registration, stating that opinions and justifications do not fall under ...
Corporate Law : IBBI disposes of SCN against IP in CIRP case, addresses claims dispute, and ongoing RoC investigation. Details of findings and DC'...
Corporate Law : The IBBI Disciplinary Committee has suspended Ms. Sonu Jain for one year due to delays and procedural lapses in the liquidation pr...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends valuer for six months for non-transparent valuation in CIRP and liquidation of Base Corporation Ltd., citing violati...
The Hon’ble Minister of State for Law & Justice and Corporate Affairs, Shri P. P. Chaudhary gave away registration certificates to the first set of 16 registered valuers at an event today at IBBI Office, Mayur Bhawan, Connaught Place, New Delhi. This marked the birth of a very important profession.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been emerged as a dynamic law and has made tremendous changes in insolvency proceedings. The code has various terminologies which has specific meaning although the definitions are mentioned in the Code but like all other legislations there is a need of interpretation. Therefore the Tribunal/Court from time to time has been given its interpretation through various jugdements. Few terms like financial creditor, dispute and other procedural expressions can be understood with the help of below mentioned judgements.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 introduced on 28 May, 2016, was brought in to consolidate and amend the laws relating to insolvency and bankruptcy. Within the framework envisaged in the Code, there were plethora of cases admitted for corporate insolvency resolution, including 12 large stressed companies such as Essar Steels Limited, Bhushan Steels Limited, Amtek Auto Limited, etc.
Wherever the approval of resolution plan under regulation 39 (3) of the Regulations is at least 15 days away, the resolution professional shall expeditiously obtain, by electronic means, the choice of the insolvency professional from creditors in a class to act as the authorised representative of the class and proceed further in the manner as specified in regulation 16A of the Regulations.
Wherever the approval of resolution plan under regulation 39 (3) of the Regulations is at least 15 days away, the resolution professional shall expeditiously obtain, by electronic means, the choice of the insolvency professional from creditors in a class to act as the authorised representative of the class and proceed further in the manner as specified in regulation 16A of the Regulations.
An Insolvency Professional Entity (IPE) is recognised in accordance with regulation 12 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016, only if its sole objective is to provide support services to the insolvency professionals, who are its partners or directors; as the case may be.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2018 today.
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2018.
IBBI releases Discussion Paper on Discharge from Responsibility as Interim Resolution Professional, Resolution Professional or Liquidator of the Corporate Processes under the Code for comments
Pendency of serious criminal proceeding, as noted above, against the applicant adversely impacts his reputation and makes him not a person fit and proper for registration as an IP. In exercise of the powers conferred on the Board under regulation 8(3)(b) of the Regulations, I, therefore, reject the application for registration as an Insolvency Professional.
