Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Delhi HC highlights abuse of legal system in matrimonial disputes. It emphasizes accountability for false complaints in a case inv...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta HC ruled that penalties can not be imposed for expired e-way bills if there is no intent to evade taxes. Detention orders...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC ruled Central GST authority can not audit same subject matter post-State audit. Multiple proceedings barred under Sectio...
Corporate Law : The Centre must establish a High Court Bench in West UP, addressing the long-standing demand to improve access to justice for over...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC set aside an order issued the same day as SCN, citing no reasonable opportunity to file a reply, violating Section 73(2)...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
DGFT : Madras High Court directed provisional release of Second-hand Highly Specialized Equipment - Digital Multifunction Print, Copying ...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court held that the entry tax on the goods imported from the other States cannot be more than the sales tax/VAT levied...
Income Tax : Thereafter, the petitioner lodged objections on 10.03.2022. The impugned Draft Assessment Order was issued thereafter on 30.03.202...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court held that passing of order without considering the reply and without providing any opportunity of being heard is...
Goods and Services Tax : Held that the intimations and notices were uploaded in the 'Additional Notices' tab instead of the 'Notices' tab, and the petition...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Delhi High Court under its inherent power under section 482 of Cr. P.C. quashes the FIR as no criminality appears to have been done on the part of the petitioners. Criminal colour has been given to the civil dispute.
In a judgment by the Calcutta High Court, the authority’s email directive to reverse input tax credit (ITC) due to the retrospective cancellation of a supplier’s GST registration was set aside. The court emphasized the need for a valid basis for cancellation, violation of natural justice, and directed the authority to remit the reversed amount within 10 days.
In an important judgement, the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has asserted that the Appellate Authority cannot overstep the allegations made in the Show Cause Notice (SCN).
Discover the critical verdict by the Calcutta High Court that cash credit accounts cannot be provisionally attached, setting an essential legal precedent.
Bombay High Court held that as per clause (xiii) of section 144B(1), reply can be filed by the assessee on the date and time as specified or within the extended time. Accordingly, shutting down the window before completion of extended time limit is unjustified. Hence, assessment order liable to be quashed.
Bombay High Court held that that since revenue authorities have not registered their claim/attachment order with CERSAI, they cannot claim priority over dues of the Government.
Bombay High Court held that since the Assessee does not have a Permanent Establishment in India, income earned by it as business profit would not be taxable in India by virtue of the provisions of Article 7 of the India-Malaysia DTAA.
Delhi High Court held that subsidy received from Government of Goa for establishing an industrial unit in a backward area is capital receipt. Further, as subsidy was not intended to meet part of cost of assets, no adjustment against cost of asset could be ordered.
Bombay High Court addressed the issue of the time limit for filing appeals to the tribunal. The court held that the appeal must be made within three months from the date of constitution of the Appellate Tribunal.
Gujarat High Court held that the Company Secretary attached with the office of the Official Liquidator shall be henceforth entitled to be paid remuneration in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 30.11.2018.
