Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Allahabad High Court issues significant directives following alleged misconduct in Lucknow District Courts. Detailed analysis and ...
Corporate Law : Explore the groundbreaking judgment by the Rajasthan High Court on the ethical conduct of lawyers, emphasizing the need to priorit...
Corporate Law : Explore recent Supreme Court rulings on dissenting creditor rights and set-off claims in insolvency cases. Detailed analysis of ke...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC criticizes Labour Court, deems dismissal for brief absence disproportionate. Read the landmark judgment's insights here....
Goods and Services Tax : Explore legal rulings and implications regarding GST rate for mango pulp, including recent judgment by Gujarat High Court and its ...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Income Tax : The Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur in the matter of, Abhay Singla v. Union of India, has recently issued notice in a public interest...
Goods and Services Tax : Rajasthan High Court rules that a writ petition against an assessment order is not maintainable if the appeal remedy is not availe...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Corporate Law : Court refused to entertain the PIL but granted the aggrieved parties liberty to raise the issue of interpreting Section 66 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court directs expeditious disposal of Hari Om Enterprises' GST registration cancellation application alleging incorrect...
Goods and Services Tax : Acknowledging the mutual desire of both parties for cancellation of registration, the court modified the order to cancel the regis...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
Corporate Law : It is hereby ordered that henceforth, for the purpose of filing of pleadings, petitions, affidavits or other documents in the High...
Delhi High Court held that restrictions on utilization of input tax credit imposed under rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules cannot extend beyond the period of one year.
Calcutta High Court held that order passed without considering statements recorded under section 108 of the Customs Act which are not retracted is liable to be interfered.
ESL Steel Limited Vs Bharat Heavy Electronic Limited (Jharkhand High Court) The Petitioner made supplies for export to Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd (BHEL). The goods were ultimately exported, albeit with delay. Petitioner and BHEl made representations to the Revenue for condonation of delay in exports. Reliance was placed on Para 5.1 of Circular No. 37/11/2018-GST […]
Patna HC set aside the ex-parte rejection orders passed by the Revenue Department, owing to the violation of natural justice principles.
Calcutta High Court held that the rates of tax as increased would be prospective and shall not affect the pending contracts and therefore would be entitled to the compounded rate of tax at 2% for the relevant period.
Bombay High Court held that order passed without taking into account the reply and document produced by the petitioner to the show cause notice is liable to be quashed and set aside.
Delhi High Court directed 10% of the penalty amount imposed by the Competition Commission of India, the recovery of the remaining 90% of the penalty amount would remain stayed.
ABB Global Industries Vs Union of India (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High court In case of ABB Global Industries and services Pvt Ltd, Quashed the order passed by the PO on reason of natural justice , as petitioner requested additional time for hearing , PO rejected and passed the order FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF […]
State of Kerala Vs West Bengal Lottery Stockists Syndicate Private Limited (Kerala High Court) Kerala high court In the case of West Bengal Lottery Stockist Syndicate Pvt Ltd, HC held that Such clarification include information to ascertain the legality of the business proposed to be conducted by the applicant, but it does not include furnishing […]
HC held that violation of natural justice is not fatal in all situations and a wholistic view should be taken of the issue, such that the interests of all parties are properly balanced.
