Income Tax : This FAQ guide explains the applicability of ITR forms, filing methods, due dates, penalties, and taxpayer obligations for AY 2026...
Income Tax : This comprehensive FAQ guide explains the basics of income tax, including taxable income, previous year, assessment year, tax paym...
Goods and Services Tax : The article questions the use of Section 74 for mere reconciliation differences between Form 26AS and GSTR-1. The key takeaway is ...
Income Tax : Recent ITAT rulings clarify that presumptive taxation depends on statutory classification under the Income Tax Act. The key takeaw...
Income Tax : ITR-1 has evolved from a self-declaration return to a data-reconciliation exercise backed by AIS, TIS, and Form 26AS. Salaried tax...
Income Tax : All Odisha Tax Advocates Association requests due date extensions for AY 2025-26 ITRs and Tax Audit Reports citing portal glitches...
Income Tax : The Tax Bar Association of Bhilwara requests an extension for the FY 2024-25 income tax return and audit report deadlines, citing ...
Income Tax : Explore Income Tax Day 2024s history, significance, and key updates from Budget 2024-25, including enhanced deductions and revised...
Goods and Services Tax : Bikaner Tax Consultants Association seeks an extension of the Income Tax Return filing deadline due to ITD portal glitches and iss...
Income Tax : ICAI addresses issues with Form 26AS/TIS/AIS and ITR filing glitches, urging CBDT for timely resolution to aid taxpayers in meetin...
Service Tax : The Gauhati High Court held that a service tax demand based only on Form 26AS, without examining the nature of services or taxabil...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that professional fees claimed for raising working capital limits could not be fully allowed as the taxpayer faile...
Service Tax : The service tax demand arose from differences between income tax records and ST-3 returns. The Tribunal ruled that Form 26AS, whic...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that RTI replies showing tax return filings and bank entries did not establish that specific payments we...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT held that once receipts reflected in Form 26AS are assessed as taxable income, corresponding TDS credit cannot be deni...
Income Tax : ADVISORY NO.: 45 Dated:- 14.07.2022 0/o PCDA(0) Pune, Public Relation office (PRO) Subject: Income Tax Demand Notice under section...
Income Tax : CBDT authorizes Director General of Income-tax (Systems) to upload information relating to Foreign remittance information reported...
Service Tax : Representations have been received from various trade bodies and associations regarding instances of indiscriminate issuance of de...
Income Tax : Director-General of Income-tax (Systems) to upload information relating to GST return, which is in his possession, in the Annual I...
Income Tax : The new Form 26AS is the faceless hand-holding of the taxpayers to e-file their income tax returns quickly and correctly. From thi...
The Tribunal held that delay in filing the return due to pending probate proceedings was beyond the control of executors. It ruled that such delay constituted a bona fide explanation, leading to deletion of penalty under Section 270A.
The Tribunal held that TDS credit must be granted in the year in which the related income is assessed, even if it is not reflected in Form 26AS. The case clarifies that timing differences by the deductor cannot deny rightful credit.
The issue involved restriction of TDS credit due to mismatch between Form 26AS and return. ITAT held that such adjustments require verification and cannot be made under Section 143(1).
The case addresses whether discrepancies between ITR/Form 26AS and ST-3 returns can justify a Service Tax demand. The Tribunal held that without independent verification, such demands are unsustainable and must be set aside.
The Tribunal upheld dismissal of appeal for non-payment of tax under Section 249(4)(b). However, it remanded the case after finding that the addition based on Form 26AS may be incorrect.
The Tribunal held that no disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) can be made where loans are advanced from interest-free funds. It observed that availability of own funds and recovery during the year supported the assessee’s claim.
The issue was whether services related to road construction for government bodies are taxable. The Tribunal held that such services are exempt, making the demand unsustainable.
The Tribunal held that service tax liability cannot be determined merely from Form 26AS entries without examining the nature of services. It set aside a ₹47.96 lakh demand after finding that the services were exempt road and canal construction works.
The High Court held that failure to conduct mandatory pre-show cause consultation rendered the tax proceedings unsustainable, and remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh decision on merits.
The case involved alleged bogus job-work transactions linked to a third party. The Tribunal found the receipts were genuine business income duly audited and taxed, leading to deletion of additions.
