Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Samhith Fintech Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Samhith Fintech Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Procedural lapse can’t forfeit TDS credit: ITAT directs grant of Form 26AS credit despite no claim in return Hyderabad ITAT  allowed the assessee’s appeal &  set aside denial of TDS credit of ₹6.66 lakh. Tribunal noted that TDS was duly deducted in the name of the assessee &  clearly reflected in Form 26AS, but credit was denied by CPC &  upheld by CIT(A) solely because the assessee had inadvertently failed to claim the credit in the return of income. ITAT held that section 199 of the Act creates a substantive right to TDS ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930