Income Tax : This FAQ guide explains the applicability of ITR forms, filing methods, due dates, penalties, and taxpayer obligations for AY 2026...
Income Tax : This comprehensive FAQ guide explains the basics of income tax, including taxable income, previous year, assessment year, tax paym...
Goods and Services Tax : The article questions the use of Section 74 for mere reconciliation differences between Form 26AS and GSTR-1. The key takeaway is ...
Income Tax : Recent ITAT rulings clarify that presumptive taxation depends on statutory classification under the Income Tax Act. The key takeaw...
Income Tax : ITR-1 has evolved from a self-declaration return to a data-reconciliation exercise backed by AIS, TIS, and Form 26AS. Salaried tax...
Income Tax : All Odisha Tax Advocates Association requests due date extensions for AY 2025-26 ITRs and Tax Audit Reports citing portal glitches...
Income Tax : The Tax Bar Association of Bhilwara requests an extension for the FY 2024-25 income tax return and audit report deadlines, citing ...
Income Tax : Explore Income Tax Day 2024s history, significance, and key updates from Budget 2024-25, including enhanced deductions and revised...
Goods and Services Tax : Bikaner Tax Consultants Association seeks an extension of the Income Tax Return filing deadline due to ITD portal glitches and iss...
Income Tax : ICAI addresses issues with Form 26AS/TIS/AIS and ITR filing glitches, urging CBDT for timely resolution to aid taxpayers in meetin...
Service Tax : The Gauhati High Court held that a service tax demand based only on Form 26AS, without examining the nature of services or taxabil...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that professional fees claimed for raising working capital limits could not be fully allowed as the taxpayer faile...
Service Tax : The service tax demand arose from differences between income tax records and ST-3 returns. The Tribunal ruled that Form 26AS, whic...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court held that RTI replies showing tax return filings and bank entries did not establish that specific payments we...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT held that once receipts reflected in Form 26AS are assessed as taxable income, corresponding TDS credit cannot be deni...
Income Tax : ADVISORY NO.: 45 Dated:- 14.07.2022 0/o PCDA(0) Pune, Public Relation office (PRO) Subject: Income Tax Demand Notice under section...
Income Tax : CBDT authorizes Director General of Income-tax (Systems) to upload information relating to Foreign remittance information reported...
Service Tax : Representations have been received from various trade bodies and associations regarding instances of indiscriminate issuance of de...
Income Tax : Director-General of Income-tax (Systems) to upload information relating to GST return, which is in his possession, in the Annual I...
Income Tax : The new Form 26AS is the faceless hand-holding of the taxpayers to e-file their income tax returns quickly and correctly. From thi...
The CPC taxed interest solely based on Form 26AS despite the assessee following the cash method. The Tribunal ruled that taxation requires verification of receipt and remanded the issue to the AO.
The Tribunal noted that Form 26AS discrepancies were caused by contracts and TDS continuing in the proprietor’s PAN after business conversion. Since reconciliation was not properly examined, the issue was sent back for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that Form 26AS is not conclusive when deduction of tax is otherwise established. Denial of TDS credit would amount to double taxation, which Section 205 expressly prohibits.
The assessee explained that income and TDS were recognized in different financial years. ITAT restored the matter for limited verification and barred automatic taxation.
The AO passed a rectification order while the core section 50C addition was pending fresh adjudication. ITAT ruled that such parallel adjudication leads to inconsistency and must be avoided.
Form 26AS helps taxpayers verify TDS, taxes paid, and refunds before filing returns. Matching it with your records reduces errors and tax notices.
Tribunal held that income cannot be added merely because it appears in Form 26AS and remanded matter to verify whether assessee actually received amounts corresponding to TDS credits.
ITAT held that failure to claim TDS credit in the return is only a procedural lapse. Once TDS is reflected in Form 26AS, credit must be granted after verifying corresponding income.
The Tribunal admitted additional evidence such as partnership deeds, royalty ledgers, and source-wise cash deposit mapping. Since AO never verified these materials, the addition under Section 69A could not be sustained. The issue was restored for proper factual examination.
An addition of ₹14,54,029/- was challenged on sundry creditor differences. The tribunal found total liabilities in the audited balance sheet matched the ITR. Key takeaway: Proper accounting of provisions ensures no unwarranted addition.
