Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that a genuine buyer cannot lose ITC merely because the seller failed to deposit tax. The key takeaway is that liab...
Goods and Services Tax : SC ruled a bona fide buyer cannot be denied ITC under DVAT Act if seller defaults on depositing tax. The remedy is against default...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court affirmed that an innocent buyer cannot be denied ITC solely due to the seller's failure to remit tax or file ret...
Goods and Services Tax : High Court of Delhi held Section 9(2)(g) of Delhi VAT Act to the extent it disallows Input tax credit to purchaser due to default ...
Income Tax : Application for allotment of Permanent Account Number(PAN) will be filed in SPICe (INC-32) form using Digital Signature of the app...
Goods and Services Tax : Department has decided to hire services of an experienced agency, for collecting, processing and creating electronic database in ...
Goods and Services Tax : The India International Trade Fair (IITF) shall be held from 14-11-2015 to 27-112015 at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi. Registered de...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been decided to introduce a reward scheme for informers providing vital inputs in order to check and detect value added tax...
Goods and Services Tax : As per the section 48 and Rules 42 & 19 of Delhi VAT Act & Rules, you are also required to maintain and retain prescribed records ...
Goods and Services Tax : Buy goods from a trusted seller who files return and thereby pays due tax collected from you. Mere 2B statement filing by selling ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that the pre-deposit requirement introduced by the third proviso to Section 74(1) of the DVAT Act could ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court examined whether ITC can be denied when the supplier fails to deposit tax. It upheld the provision, ruling that ITC depe...
Goods and Services Tax : SC ordered Department to comply with High Court directions and issue C-Forms and F-Forms after verification of indemnity bonds, le...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court permitted petitioner to rectify DVAT returns for first quarter of 2013-14 by filing revised return for said perio...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court rules bona fide purchasers cannot be denied Input Tax Credit due to seller's tax default; cites Article 14....
Goods and Services Tax : Discover how the Department of Trade and Taxes in Delhi addresses concerns raised by the Sales Tax Bar Association regarding recti...
Goods and Services Tax : Get insights into the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi's Department of Trade and Taxes' latest policy instruction...
Goods and Services Tax : Concerned GST refund sanctioning authority shall ensure that all GST refund applications are processed and decided within the pres...
Goods and Services Tax : under Section 54 of the DGST Act, 2017, taxpayer can claim the refund of any payment and interest before the expiry of two years f...
Goods and Services Tax : It has recently come to notice that, An account was de-freezed on the basis of the letter signed by the Ward In-charge, whereas it...
Delhi High Court held that appeal pertaining to period prior to 01 April 2005 is maintainable under Section 81 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT) instead of section 45 of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 since appeal is preferred after 01 April 2005.
Delhi High Court held that interest under section 42 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act entitled to the petitioner as department has illegally retained the money of the petitioner for the long time.
Delhi High Court held that department cannot possibly seek to justify the retention of refund claim on account of its having been deposited voluntarily or being barred by limitation. Accordingly, refund claim allowed.
Delhi High Court held that petitioner is duly entitled for interest under section 42(1) of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (the DVAT Act) since refund withheld unjustifiably.
Delhi High Court rules that interest on refunds under the DVAT Act should be computed from the date of the DVAT Appellate Tribunal’s order, not from the deposit date.
Allahabad High Court rules against Rajshi Processors for wrongful ITC claims based on non-existent firms. Learn about the judgment and its implications on GST Section 16.
Delhi High Court grants interest on delayed refund under Delhi Sales Tax Act after 90 days from the claim date. Full text of the judgment provided.
Explore how the Supreme Court’s ruling reinforces strict adherence to refund timelines under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act in the case of Commissioner vs FEMC Pratibha JV.
Delhi High Court orders interest payment for a 3-year delay in refund under Delhi Sales Tax Act in Tarapore & Co. vs. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr case.
Delhi High Court directs payment of simple interest at 6% under Section 42 of DVAT Act for delayed refund claim in Satbir Filing Station vs Delhi VAT Officer case.
