Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that a genuine buyer cannot lose ITC merely because the seller failed to deposit tax. The key takeaway is that liab...
Goods and Services Tax : SC ruled a bona fide buyer cannot be denied ITC under DVAT Act if seller defaults on depositing tax. The remedy is against default...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court affirmed that an innocent buyer cannot be denied ITC solely due to the seller's failure to remit tax or file ret...
Goods and Services Tax : High Court of Delhi held Section 9(2)(g) of Delhi VAT Act to the extent it disallows Input tax credit to purchaser due to default ...
Income Tax : Application for allotment of Permanent Account Number(PAN) will be filed in SPICe (INC-32) form using Digital Signature of the app...
Goods and Services Tax : Department has decided to hire services of an experienced agency, for collecting, processing and creating electronic database in ...
Goods and Services Tax : The India International Trade Fair (IITF) shall be held from 14-11-2015 to 27-112015 at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi. Registered de...
Goods and Services Tax : It has been decided to introduce a reward scheme for informers providing vital inputs in order to check and detect value added tax...
Goods and Services Tax : As per the section 48 and Rules 42 & 19 of Delhi VAT Act & Rules, you are also required to maintain and retain prescribed records ...
Goods and Services Tax : Buy goods from a trusted seller who files return and thereby pays due tax collected from you. Mere 2B statement filing by selling ...
Goods and Services Tax : SC ordered Department to comply with High Court directions and issue C-Forms and F-Forms after verification of indemnity bonds, le...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court permitted petitioner to rectify DVAT returns for first quarter of 2013-14 by filing revised return for said perio...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court rules bona fide purchasers cannot be denied Input Tax Credit due to seller's tax default; cites Article 14....
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court examines constitutional validity of DVAT Act Section 9(2)(g), impacting Input Tax Credit claims due to selling de...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court rules Section 9(2)(g) of DVAT Act unconstitutional, asserting it violates rights by denying input tax credit to b...
Goods and Services Tax : Discover how the Department of Trade and Taxes in Delhi addresses concerns raised by the Sales Tax Bar Association regarding recti...
Goods and Services Tax : Get insights into the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi's Department of Trade and Taxes' latest policy instruction...
Goods and Services Tax : Concerned GST refund sanctioning authority shall ensure that all GST refund applications are processed and decided within the pres...
Goods and Services Tax : under Section 54 of the DGST Act, 2017, taxpayer can claim the refund of any payment and interest before the expiry of two years f...
Goods and Services Tax : It has recently come to notice that, An account was de-freezed on the basis of the letter signed by the Ward In-charge, whereas it...
Delhi High Court orders refund decision within 4 weeks for Central Herbal Expo’s claim under DVAT Act. Get insights into the judgment.
Delhi High Court orders consideration of interest claim under Section 42 of DVAT Act for non-payment of interest on VAT refund within two weeks.
Delhi High Court sets aside order rejecting Kesri Steels’ refund claim due to missing records. Verified documents revive claim, leading to case remand for proper evaluation within 4 weeks.
Delhi High Court directs payment of VAT refund exceeding Rs. 13 lakhs with statutory interest as per DVAT Act, addressing pending applications.
Delhi High Court stays proceedings against misuse of DVAT registration for wrongful GST ITC availment in the case of Aakash Gupta vs. Commissioner.
ASES Security Pvt Ltd wins Delhi High Court directive for speedy processing of Rs 8,35,184/- VAT refund within two weeks. Details of the case and judgment.
Since the coconut oil was sold by assessee in small packs; was displayed in the category of hair care; the manner in which it was to applied on hair; and the purpose for which it was purchased by the consumer leave no manner of doubt that the coconut oil sold by assessee was classifiable in a residual entry attracting tax at the rate of 12.5% .
The HC, in its judgment, expressed dissatisfaction with the substantial time gap between the petitioner’s hearing and the issuance of the impugned order. The court held that the order was liable to be set aside considering this time lag. Additionally, it emphasized that the officer who passed the order had not heard the petitioner, raising concerns about procedural fairness.
Delhi High Court rules that non-payment of VAT on repossessed vehicle sale, asserting DVAT Act exemption, is not deemed concealment, setting aside penalty orders.
Explore the Delhi High Court case: Indusind Bank vs. Dept. of Trade & Taxes. Constitutional validity of DVAT Act’s ‘dealer’ definition challenged. Court analysis and decision detailed.
