Case Law Details
Commissioner of Trade and Taxes Vs FEMC Pratibha Joint Venture (Supreme Court of India)
In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the mandatory nature of the time limit for refunds under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. This article examines the case between the Commissioner of Trade and Taxes and FEMC Pratibha Joint Venture, shedding light on the implications of the court’s decision.
The case centered on whether the timeline for refund prescribed in Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act should be strictly adhered to while adjusting dues against refund amounts. FEMC Pratibha Joint Venture, engaged in works contracts for Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, claimed refunds for excess tax credit. Despite filing returns, the appellant delayed the refund, prompting the respondent to challenge the adjustment order and default notices in the Delhi High Court.
The High Court, citing the mandate of Section 38 and precedent, emphasized the necessity of adhering to refund timelines. It ruled against the appellant, asserting that the department lacked justification to retain the refund beyond the stipulated period. The Supreme Court concurred with this view, underscoring the mandatory nature of Section 38(3) and dismissing the appeal.
FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
