Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : Tristar Transport (India) Pvt. Ltd. faces penalties for delayed compliance with Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013, as per ROC ...
Company Law : Regional Director modifies CSR penalty for Clairvoyant India, waiving fines for directors, and reducing company penalty due to pro...
Company Law : Vatan Textiles Ltd.'s appeal against penalties for delayed annual return filing was rejected due to late submission. RoC Mumbai's ...
Company Law : Vatan Textiles' appeal against penalties for delayed financial statement filing was rejected by the Regional Director, Mumbai, due...
Company Law : Emperium Constructions Pvt Ltd fined Rs. 50,000 for delayed INC-20A filing. Directors penalized Rs. 19,000 each under Section 10A ...
Menzies Aviation Bobba (Bangalore) Private Limited failed to appoint a whole-time company secretary (CS) within the prescribed time frame, resulting in a violation of Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 for a period of 730 days. The managing director, Mr. Bobba Veerasamynathan, has been held liable for the violation. The order imposes a penalty […]
The company, registered under the jurisdiction of RoC Karnataka, failed to dematerialize securities before transferring them, in violation of Rule 9A(3)(a) of the Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014. The penalties of Rs. 10,000 each have been imposed on the company and its directors, Anil Prem Dsouza and Hansa Sharma.
As per Rule 23A of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, the declaration under section 10A by a director shall be in Form No. INC-20A and shall be filed as provided in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 and the contents of the said form shall be verified by a company secretary or a […]
Resonance Eduventures Limited, its MD & CEO, and CS face a penalty of 7 Lakhs imposed by Ministry of Corporate Affairs for not constituting Nomination and Remuneration Committee as required by Companies Act, 2013.”
Resonance Eduventures Ltd faces a 7 lakh penalty from MCA for not constituting an audit committee, violating Section 177 of Companies Act 2013. Details here.
Registrar of Companies in Rajasthan penalizes Resonance Eduventures for not constituting an audit committee, imposing a 7 Lakh penalty.
Discover penalty imposed by MCA on Resonance Eduventures Limited for failing to appoint independent directors, as per Companies Act 2013. Learn about violation, penalties, and implications.
Dive into the appeal under Companies Act, 2013 by Vaasudev Grain Mill Pvt Ltd. Learn about penalties, Covid-19 challenges, and the final resolution by the Regional Director.
As per the provisions of Section 10A(1), a newly incorporated company with share capital must file a declaration within 180 days of incorporation, confirming that every subscriber to the memorandum has paid the value of the shares agreed upon. The company also needs to verify its registered office details. However, Vena Energy Aura Private Limited failed to fulfill these requirements.
Company failed to appoint a Whole Time Company Secretary within the required timeframe of six months, as per the provisions of Section 203(1) of the Act. The company eventually appointed a Whole Time Company Secretary with a delay of 140 days. This delay resulted in a violation of Section 203(1) and rendered the company and its officers liable under Section 203(5).
