Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
ROC Delhi imposes penalty on GAME CHANGERS TEXFAB LIMITED and its directors for violating Sections 62 and 117(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, related to loan conversion and special resolution filing.
ROC Delhi imposes a ₹45,00,000 penalty on Game Changers Texfab Limited and two directors for multiple failures related to Private Placement rules under Section 42(10).
ROC Delhi fined Game Changers Texfab Limited and its directors ₹1,16,000 for a 56-day delay in filing the Return of Allotment (PAS-3). Subsidiary status denied reduced penalty.
ROC Ahmedabad issues an adjudication order and ₹1,26,000 penalty on Narayan Organics Pvt Ltd and its directors for a 215-day delay in filing a Board Resolution (MGT-14) under the Companies Act, 2013.
Gujarat Kidney and Super Speciality Limited penalized ₹12,80,000 by ROC Ahmedabad for a 256-day delay in filing the revised Return of Allotment (PAS-3) and related stamp duty issues.
ROC Ahmedabad adjudicated penalties on a company and its directors for minor record date and allotment errors in a rights issue. The ruling highlights that voluntary correction and good corporate governance can mitigate penalties.
Virupaksha Organics and its directors are fined for a long-standing failure to constitute an Audit Committee. This ROC order outlines the penalties for the company’s non-compliance with the Companies Act.
Registrar of Companies levies penalties on directors for omitting contact details from Board Report letterhead, highlighting statutory duties under Section 12(3)(c) of Companies Act, 2013.
The Goa Registrar of Companies has fined Auraelite Tech Private Limited and its directors for failing to maintain a functional registered office as required by law.
The Goa Registrar of Companies has fined Gazra Analytical Solutions Private Limited and its directors for not maintaining a functional registered office.
