Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : RGPL Commodities Pvt Ltd faces penalties under Section 89(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-6. Total ...
Company Law : GM Elektra Pvt Ltd fined ₹1,88,500 by ROC Mumbai for delayed filing of BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Direct...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies penalizes Paramount Dye Tec Limited for not disclosing trading activity in its MOA, violating Section 4(1)(...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Singodwala Warehousing for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of Companies Act. Fine details and appeal process ...
Company Law : MBL Infrastructure Ltd. faces scrutiny under Section 90 of the Companies Act for non-compliance. Details on adjudicating officer's...
Learn about the penalty imposed by MCA for violating the main object clause of MOA. Detailed analysis of the case and implications. Read more.
Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, imposes a substantial 66.16 Lakh penalty on Saankhya Labs Private Limited for violating CSR provisions under Companies Act, 2013.
Read the detailed analysis of an appeal under Companies Act, 2013, against a penalty levied on Toyotsu Bharat Integrated Services Private Limited. Learn about the case and the final verdict
Section 155 of Companies Act, 2013, prohibits possession of multiple DINs by any individual director. In this article, we will analyse Order of ROC, Tamil Nadu , involving a director, Shri. Thiyagarajan Parthasarathy
MCA imposes penalties on Sarada Pleasure And Adventure Limited and its directors for non-appointment of Managing Director, Company Secretary, and CFO, in violation of Section 203 of Companies Act, 2013.
MCA imposes penalties on Sarada Pleasure And Adventure Limited and its directors for non-maintenance of statutory registers of members under Companies Act, 2013
MCA imposes penalties on Sarada Pleasure And Adventure Limited and its directors for non-holding of board meetings in violation of Section 173 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) penalizes Mahadeva Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. & directors for not displaying contact info on board resolution. Analysis & order details.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 4 lakh on Bangda Real Infra Limited and its directors for non-maintenance of its registered office. This penalty follows a violation of section 12(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, which mandates companies to have a registered office capable of receiving and acknowledging all communications […]
Sarada Pleasure And Adventure Limited, a Bihar-based company, is ordered to pay penalties for violating Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013 by not filing financial statements.
