Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : RGPL Commodities Pvt Ltd faces penalties under Section 89(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-6. Total ...
Company Law : GM Elektra Pvt Ltd fined ₹1,88,500 by ROC Mumbai for delayed filing of BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Direct...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies penalizes Paramount Dye Tec Limited for not disclosing trading activity in its MOA, violating Section 4(1)(...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Singodwala Warehousing for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of Companies Act. Fine details and appeal process ...
Company Law : MBL Infrastructure Ltd. faces scrutiny under Section 90 of the Companies Act for non-compliance. Details on adjudicating officer's...
DGR Farms & Leisures Limited failed to file balance sheets for 4 years. The company and its directors must now pay a penalty of ₹1.68 lakh to ₹2 lakh each. This order by the Registrar of Companies highlights the importance of filing financial statements on time.
Authorized Representative of the company highlighted the company’s status as a private limited entity during the fiscal year 2015-16, arguing that the provisions concerning the constitution of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee were inapplicable.
Explore the penalty order issued by the Adjudicating Officer against Krazzy Fin Pvt Ltd for violating Section 62(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the case details and implications.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not having a registered office for over 1000 days, violating the Companies Act. This case highlights the importance of companies maintaining a registered office.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has penalized Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file its financial statements for three financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has imposed a penalty on Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file annual returns for three financial years. This order serves as a reminder to companies of their obligation to file annual returns and the consequences of non-compliance.
Government penalty for Somen Venture Private Limited for failing to update director addresses. Directors Kahkashan Zar & Mohammad Neyaz Ahmad fined ₹2.21 Lakhs each for violating Rule 12. Know your rights to appeal the order.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing Annual Return for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with Annual Return filing requirements.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not filing financial statements for two financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
M/s. Octacle Integration Private Limited director failed to comply with Companies Act by not obtaining DIN. Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of ₹3,65,500.
