Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Explore the case of WURKNET PRIVATE LIMITED penalized by MCA under Section 62(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Analysis of violation, hearing details, and imposed penalties
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs penalizes WURKNET PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Companies Act, 2013 by not disclosing ESOP details. Analysis, implications, and order details
Explore the MCA’s penalty on VALOR ADVISORY for Section 89 violation, analyzing delays in filing MGT-4. Detailed order, penalties, and compliance steps revealed.
Read about the penalty imposed on Krishikan Krishikan Private Limited under Companies Act, 2013 for violation of Section 62(1)(c). Analysis of the case and penalties.
Explore the adjudication order under Companies Act, 2013 by the Registrar of Companies, Karnataka, imposing penalties on Quest Global Engineering Services for violating CSR provisions.
Read about the penalty imposed by MCA on Samsung R&D for delayed submission of MSME Form I. Detailed analysis, penalties, and key insights provide
Discover the consequences faced by Stanley OEM Sofas Limited for delaying MGT-14 filing, leading to a hefty Rs. 3.5 Lakh penalty imposed by the MCA. Get insights into the violation, adjudication process, and the Registrar of Companies order
Government of India penalizes Holitech India with ₹10.50 Lakh for violating Companies Act, 2013. Failure to maintain charges in Form CHG.7 leads to penalties.
Government of India imposes an INR 8.50 Lakh penalty on HOLITECH INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED for violating Companies Act 2013. Detailed analysis of the Board report non-compliance and penalty imposition
Explore the penalty imposed by MCA on SACS Infotech for violating Section 180(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. In-depth analysis, consequences, and appeal process reveale
