Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Explore the adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, against Petron Minerals & Metals Limited by the Registrar of Companies, Uttar Pradesh.
Wurknet Pvt Ltd fined under Section 454 for contravening Sections 101 and 118 of the Companies Act, 2013. Detailed analysis of the ROC Mumbai order.
Discover how WURKNET Pvt Ltd faced penalties under Sections 101 and 118 of the Companies Act for procedural violations. Understand the implications and legal repercussions in detail.
Government of India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs imposes penalties on DGR Farms & Leisures Limited and its directors for violating the Companies Act by failing to file annual returns. Details here.
DGR Farms & Leisures Limited failed to file balance sheets for 4 years. The company and its directors must now pay a penalty of ₹1.68 lakh to ₹2 lakh each. This order by the Registrar of Companies highlights the importance of filing financial statements on time.
Nipponzone Securities Pvt Ltd fined ₹4 lakh for not addressing audit remarks as per Section 134(3)(f) of the Companies Act, 2013. Details of the adjudication order.
Authorized Representative of the company highlighted the company’s status as a private limited entity during the fiscal year 2015-16, arguing that the provisions concerning the constitution of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee were inapplicable.
Explore the penalty order issued by the Adjudicating Officer against Krazzy Fin Pvt Ltd for violating Section 62(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the case details and implications.
The company and its directors have been penalized for not having a registered office for over 1000 days, violating the Companies Act. This case highlights the importance of companies maintaining a registered office.
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has penalized Pacelife Marketing Private Limited for failing to file its financial statements for three financial years. This order highlights the importance of companies complying with financial filing requirements.
