Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : Explore penalties imposed on Mynd Fintech under Section 89 of Companies Act, 2013 by ROC, NCT of Delhi & Haryana. Understand impli...
Company Law : The Order No. 002/2024 Date: 05.01.2024, centered around CA Anil Chauhan, the Engagement Partner (EP) of Anil Chauhan & Associates...
Company Law : Section 155 of Companies Act, 2013, prohibits possession of multiple DINs by any individual director. In this article, we will ana...
SEBI : Uncover the legal complexities and SEBI regulations involved in the process of gifting shares by promoters of listed companies. Fr...
Company Law : Discover the challenges faced by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India in filing Form DPT-3 for FY 2023-24. Learn about te...
Company Law : IEPFA invites stakeholders to share insights on streamlining claims settlement process under the Companies Act, 2013. Deadline: Ap...
Company Law : ICSI requests amendments to Sections 204 & 149(6)(e)(ii)(A) of Companies Act,, to enable Company Secretaries in practice to be Ind...
Company Law : ICSI suggests Form DIR-6 modification, urging Corporate Affairs Ministry to allow Company Secretaries to update changes in their p...
Company Law : ICSI suggests an amendment in Section 77 of Companies Act, 2013. It aims to allow charge registration beyond 120 days with ad valo...
Corporate Law : That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended ei...
Company Law : Discover the adjudication order under Section 203(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. Standard Glass Lining Technology Ltd. penalized f...
Company Law : Check out the latest Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules 2024 issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, omitting word Nidhi f...
Company Law : Multiple Updates of Mobile Number or Email Address in DIN Allowed by MCA by submitting e‑form DIR‑3 KYC on payment of fees of ...
Company Law : Read about the Specified Companies Order amendment under Companies Act 2013 to enhance reporting on payments to micro and small en...
Company Law : Government of India amends Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014. Learn about the changes and the new Form MGT-6 e...
Non-Appointment of CS – Penalty reduced on closely held private company and further imposing maximum penalty by the Registrar of Companies on the company, its Managing Director and other directors is harsh, burdensome on the Company.
Company is having a Managing Director and imposing penalty on non-executive director for Non-Appointment of CS should not have been made.
Non-Appointment of CS – MCA reduces penalty as all shareholders of Company are family members, no public interest is involved.
MCA reduces penalty as candidates who have consented for relocation to remote area for appointment as Company Secretary in company demanded a higher pay scale (above and beyond industry standards)
(a) due to Covid-19 pandemic, Company was unable to appoint Whole Time Company Secretary as none shown interest despite company’s effort during that period. (b) company is having negative reserves and surplus during the year 2021-2022. It has incurred losses during the year 2021.
NFRA’s investigations inter-alia revealed that the MACEL’s Auditor for the FY 2019-20 failed to meet the relevant requirements of the Standards on Auditing (‘SA’ hereafter) in a number of significant aspects and demonstrated a serious lack of competence. The EP failed to exercise professional judgement & skepticism during audit of fraudulent borrowings of Rs. 4,438.37 […]
Non-Appointment CS – penalty reduced – Ac imposing maximum penalty by Registrar of Companies on company, its Managing Director and other director is very harsh, burdensome on Company.
As Rule 8A (Appointment of Company Secretaries in Companies Not Covered Under Rule 8) of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 (w.e.f 09.06.2014), a company other than a company covered under Rule 8 which has a paid-up share capital of five crore rupees or more shall have a whole-time company secretary. […]
ub-section (5) of Section 203 of the Act provides that if any company makes any default in complying with the provisions of this section, such company shall be liable to a penalty of five lakh rupees and every director and key managerial personnel of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of fifty thousand rupees and where the default is a continuing one, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which such default continues but not exceeding five lakh rupees.
Penalty for Non-Appointment CS – matter is returned back to Registrar of Companies advising to re-examine the issues in totality and pass fresh order by taking the above facts into consideration before passing adjudication order and imposing penalty on the Company and its defaulting officers.
