CA, CS, CMA : Explore the implications of the inclusion of practicing professionals like CAs, CSs, and CWAs under the Prevention of Money-Launde...
Income Tax : Discover the FAQs on issues in filing Tax Audit Report Form 3CA-CD/3CB-CD. Learn about prerequisites, process, and more....
Goods and Services Tax : Hon’ble SC has in the case of UNION OF INDIA & ORS v/s M/S VISHNU AROMA POUCHING PVT. LTD. & ANR in SPECIAL LEAVE PETITI...
Income Tax : How much Vivad would be closed and how much Vishwas the Vivad se Vishwas scheme will be able to achieve that in coming months woul...
Income Tax : As mark of celebration of 159th Income Tax Day on 24th July,2019, CBDT in a mega event to be held in Delhi to be graced by Hon’b...
Income Tax : Addressing glitches in ITD portal, the Association of Tax Lawyers requests an extension for the ITR filing deadline due to signifi...
CA, CS, CMA : Members & Students Services (Grievances Handling and e-Sahaayataa) Directorate The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India...
Income Tax : We are drawing your kind attention towards Proposed Amendment in Section 43B of The Income Tax Act, 1961, which is detrimental to ...
Income Tax : CBDT proposes to introduce a common ITR by merging all the existing returns of income except ITR-7. However, the current ITR-1 and...
Goods and Services Tax : Clarification regarding time limit for certain compliances pursuant to issuance of Notification No. 18/2022-Central Tax dated 28.0...
Income Tax : Explore the detailed analysis of the ITAT Bangalore decision in Goworamma Lingappa Manjula Vs ITO. Understand the implications and...
Income Tax : Explore the ITAT Bangalore's decision in Lakshmi Multipurpose Co-operative Vs ITO regarding income threshold limits under Section ...
Corporate Law : Explore Delhi High Court's landmark verdict in Union of India vs. Kiran Kanojia. Insights into National Litigation Policy, its im...
Income Tax : Allahabad High Court quashes Section 263 order and imposes cost of Rs 10,000 on PCIT for lack of proper opportunity. Analysis of t...
Income Tax : In respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made in absence of any incriminating material found during search...
Income Tax : Understand CBDT's recent clarifications on trust audit reports. Learn about substantial contributions, relatives, and concerns in...
CA, CS, CMA : Government notifies that following transactions done by CA, CS & CMA on behalf of their client will be covered under Preventio...
Company Law : NFRA's investigations inter-alia revealed that CDGL's Auditors for FY 2018-19 failed to meet relevant requirements of Standards on...
Company Law : Instances of non-compliance with Indian Accounting Standards (Ind ASs) on Accounting Policies for measurement of Revenue from Cont...
Income Tax : Representations have been received by the Board stating that Form No.10A in some of such cases could not be filed by 31.03.2022. I...
In Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Creative Dyeing and Printing Pvt. Ltd., 318 ITR 476, an advance was given to the said assessee by the sister concern, which held 50% of the share holding in the assessee concern for mordenisation project.
It is settled law that that frequency and magnitude of transaction are also important factor to decide whether the transaction is business transaction or investment transaction. Now in our considered opinion, the magnitude of share transaction in this case does call for any enquiry
At the time of registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, which is necessary for claiming exemption under Section 11 and 12 of the Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax is not required to look into the activities, where such activities have not or are in the process of its initiation.
Hon’ble Bangalore ITAT has in the case of Shri G.N.Mohan Raju,v/s ITO in ITA No.242 & 243(Bang) 2013 has held that notice u/s 143(2) issued prior to filing of return in response to notice u/s 147 is invalid, even if return is filed late.
Hon’ble Hyderabad Bench has in the case of M/s. Ghanshyamdas Gems and Jewels v/s DCIT in IT(SS)A No. 16/Hyd/2011 has held that Section 292BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 would operate prospectively as it curtails the right of the assessee.
In sunbeam Auto case Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that though revision can be made in a case when there is lack of enquiry in the order, however, inadequate inquiries cannot be a basis of revision as it depends on the perception of the officer exercising assessment powers.
Share Application Money or deposit in the current account cannot be included in the definition of deposit so as to trigger provisions of sec 269SS of the Income Tax Act,1961. Brief facts of the case were that the assessee company was in the business of construct ion of the hotel.
Hon’ble ITAT Mumbai in the case of Pradeep G. Vora v/s ITO has dealt in depth about the power of the tribunal to admit new additional ground and has held that tribunal Cannot be Precluded from handling any point (facts or law) which pertains to the assessment even if it is raised for the first time before it and was not raised before the authorithies below by observing as under:-
The Assessing Officer has though power to re–assess but no power to review and if the concept of change of opinion is removed, then in the garb of the re–assessment, review of earlier orders would take place.
Hon’ble Delhi ITAT has in the case of DCIT v/s Heminder Kumari in ITA No. 4210-4213/Del/2013 has held that the information received by the Assessing officer from his investigation Wing, at best, be regarded as a prima-facie material, but could not be construed as conclusive for use against the assessee to fasten any tax liability, because the same was required to be corroborated by credible and independent evidence.
