Goods and Services Tax : Even after the sunset clause, anti-profiteering obligations continue through tribunals and policy directions, leaving businesses e...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court upheld an anti-profiteering order, ruling that merely increasing product quantity or volume after a GST rate ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT ruled 18% interest on GST anti-profiteering amounts applies prospectively from April 1, 2020, upholding that it cannot be im...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC rules increasing product quantity or base price instead of reducing MRP after a GST rate cut violates Section 171 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : GST 2.0 rate cuts trigger Anti-Profiteering rules (Sec 171). Summary covers obligation to pass on tax/ITC benefit, MRP display nor...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that maintaining ticket prices by increasing base price after GST reduction violated Section 171. It directed de...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed increased ITC benefits post-GST without corresponding price reduction. The tribunal ruled this violated Section...
Goods and Services Tax : The dispute concerned failure to reduce prices after GST. The Tribunal held that documentary evidence showed benefit was already t...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that no anti-profiteering violation arises where construction, agreement, and payments occur entirely in the GST regime...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved a calculation error in the final order. The Tribunal clarified the correct per sq. ft. benefit including GST an...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Authority will stop accepting requests for examination of input tax credits and tax rate reductions from April 1, 2025, as per...
Goods and Services Tax : Ministry of Finance empowers GST Appellate Tribunal to examine input tax credits and tax rate reductions, effective from October 1...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Rajesh Shaw Vs Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Applicant No.1 Rajesh Shaw alleged that the Respondent No. 1 Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and charged GST @12% on the amount due to him against payments made for […]
Kundan Kumar Sinha Vs ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged profiteering by ATS Township Pvt. Ltd. in respect of purchase of a Flat No. 4032 in Tower-4 in the Respondent’s project ‘ATS Rhapsody’, situated at Plot No. GH12/1, Sector-1, Village Bisrakh, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh. The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent had not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs ATS Homes Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the present case, are that a reference was received by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 15.10.2020 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs J.P. and Sons (NAA) NAA has observed that the Respondent, M/s J.P. and Sons was a distributor of M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. The Authority finds that M/s Johnson & Johnson Pvt. Ltd. was investigated by the DGAP for allegations of profiteering is as much he has not passed […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Raj & Company (NAA) There is no dispute with regard to the reduction of the tax in respect of subject products supplied by the Respondent with effect from 15-11-2017. The Government by Notification No 41/2017-CT (Rate) dated 14-11-2017 has reduced rates on subject products. In view of the above said […]
Sh. Sumit Mansingka Vs E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Respondent E-Homes Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. has made his detailed submissions regarding the fact that the credit of VAT for pre-GST era has been denied to him. He has also submitted copies of VAT returns and the UPVAT assessment orders for the relevant period in this regard. The […]
Vivek Gupta Vs Maheshwari Infratech Pvt Ltd (NAA) NAA held that Maheshwari Infratech Pvt Ltd has denied the benefit of ITC to the customers/flat buyers/recipients in his Project U-Faria’ in contravention of the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and has committed an offence under Section 171 (3A) of the above Act. […]
It was observed that in NAA’s Order No. 57/2022, Project Ruparel Orion had actually been considered for profiteering. Hence the contention of the Respondent appears to be true and therefore this project need not be analyzed again for determination of profiteering.
Karunakar Singh Vs Prasu Infrabuild Pvt. Ltd (NAA) 1. The present Report dated 29.10.2021 has been received by National Anti‑ Profiteering Authority (NAA or the Authority) from the Applicant No. 12 i.e. the DGAP after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the […]
Sh. Madhumal Panjumal Keswani Vs Panchshil Infrastructure Holding Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) In the Order No. 62/2022 dated 29.08.2022 of this Authority, after paragraph 32 and before paragraph 33, the following paragraph shall be added: 32A. The present investigation has been conducted up to 30.11.2020 only. However, the Respondent has not obtained the Completion Certificate (CC) […]
