Goods and Services Tax : Even after the sunset clause, anti-profiteering obligations continue through tribunals and policy directions, leaving businesses e...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court upheld an anti-profiteering order, ruling that merely increasing product quantity or volume after a GST rate ...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT ruled 18% interest on GST anti-profiteering amounts applies prospectively from April 1, 2020, upholding that it cannot be im...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi HC rules increasing product quantity or base price instead of reducing MRP after a GST rate cut violates Section 171 of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : GST 2.0 rate cuts trigger Anti-Profiteering rules (Sec 171). Summary covers obligation to pass on tax/ITC benefit, MRP display nor...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The Tribunal held that maintaining ticket prices by increasing base price after GST reduction violated Section 171. It directed de...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed increased ITC benefits post-GST without corresponding price reduction. The tribunal ruled this violated Section...
Goods and Services Tax : The dispute concerned failure to reduce prices after GST. The Tribunal held that documentary evidence showed benefit was already t...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTAT held that no anti-profiteering violation arises where construction, agreement, and payments occur entirely in the GST regime...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved a calculation error in the final order. The Tribunal clarified the correct per sq. ft. benefit including GST an...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Authority will stop accepting requests for examination of input tax credits and tax rate reductions from April 1, 2025, as per...
Goods and Services Tax : Ministry of Finance empowers GST Appellate Tribunal to examine input tax credits and tax rate reductions, effective from October 1...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Explore the sunset of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST and its logical end. Learn about its functions, merger with CCI, and implications on profiteering issues.
Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contrary to law. Reason 3: Anti-profiteering provisions are ultra vires to Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution
Stay updated on the recent developments in the Indian economy and GST till 02.11.2022. Explore the impact of global situations and key forecasts.
Sh. Sourav Majee Vs Bengal Peerless Housing Development Company Ltd. (NAA) The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA or Authority) finds from the above table that substantial Cenvat Credit of Rs. 7.32 crore was available to the Respondent in 2016-17 i.e during pre-GST period. The DGAP Report dated 12.11.2021 is silent on the above said amount of […]
Sh. K.G.M. Shushan Vs Praxis Home Retail Ltd. (NAA) NAA finds that the DGAP claimed that he has collected all relevant data and information including documents from the Respondent and have carried out in-depth investigation. However, after going through the DGAP’s investigation report, its annexures & calculations, the Respondent’s submissions and the other facts on […]
Sh. Vinod E Vs Bollineni Developers Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged that the Respondent Bollineni Developers Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of the Flat No. J 703, 7th floor purchased from the Respondent in his project ‘Bollineni Silas’, situated at Sadarmangala, K […]
Smt. Renu Mittal w/o Mool Chand Mittal Vs Anant Raj Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the Report are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed application before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and submitted that she had purchased flat in the Respondent No. l’s Project […]
Sh. Deepak Garg Vs JKG Construction Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The present Report dated 31.08.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the […]
Janki Prasad Pandey Vs Madhya Pradesh Housing and Infrastructure Development Board (NAA) The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 16.12.2020 under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application filed by the Applicant […]
Sh. Parvez Khan Vs Pearlite Real Properties Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) It has been revealed from the DGAP’s Report that the ITC as a percentage of the turnover that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 to June-2017) was 3.02% and during the post-GST period (July-2017 to December-2018), it was 6.66% for the […]
