Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Birla Corporation Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Excise CGST Udaipur (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Birla Corporation Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Excise CGST Udaipur (CESTAT Delhi)

The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of cement. They imported some machines/inputs on CIF and FOB basis. During the course of Audit, it was observed that the appellant has short paid service tax on Ocean freight, which is liable to be paid by the importer in terms of Notification No.15/2017-ST and 16/2017-ST, both dated 13.04.2017 w.e.f. 23.04.2017. Show cause notice dated 20.12.2018 proposed the demand of service tax amounting to Rs.23,60,643/-. On adjudication, the demand was reduced to R

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio


My Published Posts

Service of order by Speed Post cannot be deemed to be served in absence of proof of delivery: Section 37C of Central Excise Act-1944 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728