Case Law Details
Case Name : Jivanbhai Makwana Vs. CCE (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH
5. I have considered the submissions made by both the sides. First of all it is required to be examined whether the service is covered by the definition or not? To appreciate the facts better, the annexure to the contract which is relevant & which is very briefly worded is reproduced below.
“RATE:
1. House keeping work is as per minimum wage act
2. Material loading & unloading charge Rs. 21/mericton (raw material, store & maintenance item)
3. 20% ser vice charge on item no. I
4. Reimbursement of pf & ESIC employer’s contribution o...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

