Extended period not invocable in absence of suppression of facts with intend to evade payment of tax
Case Law Details
Case Name : Sara Leather Industries Vs Commissioner of CE & Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Sara Leather Industries Vs Commissioner of CE & Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)
CESTAT Chennai held that extended period of limitation not invocable as there is no suppression of facts with the intend to evade payment of tax. Accordingly, order dismissed on the grounds of limitation.
Facts- The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of export of leather footwear uppers and export the same to various foreign countries.
During the cour
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.