This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Extended period not invocable in absence of deliberate suppression of facts
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Reciprocal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Allahabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Reciprocal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Allahabad)
Held that extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in absence of deliberate suppression of facts with intention to evade payment of duty
Facts-
The appellant contended that the extended period of limitation under the proviso to section 73 (1) of the Finance Act could not have been invoked. The appellant also stated that the demand of service tax for the period which is within the normal period of 18 months from the relevant date may be confirmed.
Conclusion-
It was absolutely necessary for the adjudicating...




