Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suresh Kumar Bansal Vs Union of India &Ors (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Santosh Kumar (Advocate)

Advocate Santosh KumarStatute– Section 65 (105)(zzzh) of the Finance Act, 1994

Matter in dispute– Service tax on services in relation to construction of complex

Petiti

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

3 Comments

  1. B Dutt says:

    So, what is the position of Builders now? They have to collect the ST now or not??What is the position of customer? To or not pay ST to the builder?? What the clarification by ST authorities in this aspect ??Is this judgement limited to Delhi only or the nation as a whole???

  2. B Dutt says:

    So what is the net result of this judgement? Builders should stop collecting ST with immediate effect? What is the position of Customer now? Whether to pay ST or not? Is this decision relates to Delhi High Court only or to entire nation???

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31