If applicant has no layout plan to examine the contentions that the activity carried out by them does not come under the purview of residential complex

Ld. Counsel Shri Pahwa argues that the second category of work carried out with M/s. Unitech Machines Ltd., Gurgaon is exhibited by para 34 of the adjudication order at page 94. In this case, the appellant acted as a sub-contractor and tax liability has been discharged by the principal contractor. According to him such aspect remains undisputed by Revenue, in which no liability arose. But this is subject to scrutiny in the course of regular hearing. IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL WEST BLOCK NO.2, R K PURAM, NEW DELHI-110066 BENCH-DB Service Tax Stay Application No. S...