Case Law Details
Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Vs Principal Additional Director General (Karnataka High Court)
Held that services being provided by the University by collecting affiliation fee has to be considered as the service by way of education. Accordingly, exempt from service tax as per clause (l) of section 66D.
Facts-
Petitioner, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, in receipt of affiliation fees, penalty / fine for delayed payment from Colleges affiliated to it and also rents from certain buildings rented out by it.
Respondent No.1 has issued a show cause notice proposing to levy service tax on the affiliation fees, penalty / fine for delayed payment from Colleges affiliated to it and also rents from certain buildings rented out by it. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred the present writ petition.
Conclusion-
Held that the negative list of services which are not chargeable to service tax is contained in section 66D and clause (l) of section 66D covers educational services.
The petitioner – University is established under the Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000 and Universities are established by the State for furthering the advancement of learning and pursuing of higher education and research. For this purpose, apart from they themselves imparting education through their constituent colleges, it also admits educational Institutions not maintained by the University as affiliated colleges and in the process regulates the manner in which education has to be imparted in the said Colleges and also conducts examinations. In the process, for providing services for imparting education, it charges affiliation fee to the said colleges and the University has to be considered as an Educational Institution imparting education by itself and also through its affiliated colleges and the services being provided by the University by collecting affiliation fee has to be considered as the service by way of education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Petitioner is Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences and is in receipt of affiliation fees, penalty / fine for delayed payment from Colleges affiliated to it and also rents from certain buildings rented out by it.
2. Respondent No.1 has issued a show cause notice proposing to levy service tax on the affiliation fees, penalty / fine for delayed payment from Colleges affiliated to it and also rents from certain buildings rented out by it. Aggrieved by the same, the instant writ petition is filed.
3. In the writ petition, the petitioner has challenged several provisions of Finance Act, 1994 (for short hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) and the notifications issued thereunder along with the impugned show cause notice dated 20.04.2018 bearing No.SCN Sl.No.22/2018-19 vide Annexure-‘C’ and also Statement of Demand dated 02.2019 bearing No.C.No.IV/09/01/2019-SD6 877/19 vide Annexure-‘U’ to the writ petition. However, during the course of arguments, petitioner confines its prayer to the show cause notice at Annexure-‘C’ as well as Annexure-‘U’ to the writ petition and does not insist upon other prayers.
4. The case of the petitioner is that, it is imparting education and the entire affiliation fee received by it is towards the same and as per the provisions of Section 66D of the Act and notification No.25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012 as amended from time to time, consideration received by providing service by way of education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for the time being in force is exempted from service tax and thereby, the affiliation fee received by the petitioner – University is exempted from service tax and that respondent No.1 does not have the jurisdiction to issue show cause notice proposing to levy service tax on the affiliation fee received by the petitioner – University.
5. The learned counsel for the respondents admit that the consideration received from the Institutions for services by way of education as a part of curriculum for obtaining qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force is exempted from service tax. However, he contends that the affiliation fee received by the petitioner – University cannot be considered as part of the said services and that it is a consideration received towards the services provided to private Institutions by affiliating the same.
6. It is further submitted that what is under challenge is only the show cause notice and the petitioner is required to answer the same instead of approaching this Court. On the said ground, it is prayed that the writ petition be dismissed.
7. By way of the impugned show cause notice, the respondents have sought to impose service tax on the petitioner – University for the affiliation fee collected by it during the academic year – 2012-2013 to 2016-2017. As per the Act, the negative list of services which are not chargeable to service tax is contained in Section 66D and Clause(l) of Section 66D of the Act.
Clause(l) of Section 66D reads as under:-
”(I) Services by way of—
(i) pre-school education and education up to higher secondary school or equivalent;
(ii) education as a part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by any law for the time being in force;
(iii) education as a part of an approved vocational education course;”
8. The petitioner – University is established under the Karnataka State Universities Act, 2000 and Universities are established by the State for furthering the advancement of learning and pursuing of higher education and research. For this purpose, apart from they themselves imparting education through their constituent colleges, it also admits educational Institutions not maintained by the University as affiliated colleges and in the process regulates the manner in which education has to be imparted in the said Colleges and also conducts examinations. In the process, for providing services for imparting education, it charges affiliation fee to the said colleges and the University has to be considered as an Educational Institution imparting education by itself and also through its affiliated colleges and the services being provided by the University by collecting affiliation fee has to be considered as the service by way of education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force.
9. The said activity of service by way of providing education as contemplated in Clause(l) of Section 66D of the Act was issued under Finance Act, 1994 by placing the said activity under exemption list.
10. It is not the case of the respondents that the consideration received towards the educational activity is taxable for service tax. It is their case that affiliation fee collected by the petitioner – University cannot be considered as a consideration for providing educational services.
11. As already stated above, the act of University in granting affiliation to a private college has to be considered as a service in furtherance of providing education and the decision of the respondents to consider otherwise is
12. The case of the petitioner is that it is not in real estate business and certain buildings are let out by it to carry on certain activities like canteen, Bank facility and the like which are essential in running a University for imparting education.
13. Clause (3) of Section 66(F) of the Act, reads as under:-
“(3) Subject to the provisions of sub-section(2) the taxability of a bundled services shall be determined in the following manner, namely:-
a) if various elements of such service are naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, it shall be treated as provision of the single service which give such bundle its essential character;
b) if various elements of such service are not naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business, it shall be treated as provision of the single service which results in highest liability of service tax.
Explanation. – For the purpose of sub-section(3), the expression “bundled service” means bundle of provision of various services wherein an element of provision of one service is combined with an element or elements of provision of any other service or services.”
14. It is not in dispute that petitioner has let out some of its buildings for canteen, Bank and other facilities which are essential for effective running of an University in 9 furtherance to imparting education and the said activity has to be considered as an activity incidental to provide services of education and it is a service naturally bundled in the ordinary course of business as contemplated in the aforementioned Clause (3) of Section 66(F) of the Act and the rent received also deserves to be exempted once the activity of providing education by the petitioner – Institution is exempted from service tax.
15. The only question that arises for consideration is whether the petitioner is liable to pay the service tax on the rent received by it from the buildings let out by it.
16. Normally, a person is bound to reply to the show cause notice issued by the Authority and it is not appropriate for him to approach the Court without doing the same. However, in the instant case, the dispute does not pertain to quantification of service tax, but whether the respondents – Authorities have jurisdiction to demand service tax for the activity of petitioner – University in providing education. Further, it is the clear stand of the respondents – thorities before this Court that the activity 10 of the petitioner – Institution in granting affiliation to Colleges and consideration received towards it is taxable under the Service Tax.
17. Under the circumstances, it is not appropriate to relegate the petitioner before the adjudicating Authority.
18. For the aforementioned reasons, the following:-
ORDER
i The show cause notice dated 20.04.2018 bearing No.SCN Sl.No.22/2018-19 vide Annexure-‘C’ nd statement of demand dated 28.02.2019 bearing No.C.No.IV/09/01/2019- SD-6 877/19 vide Annexure-‘U’ to the writ petition are hereby set aside and consequently, all further actions pursuant to the said show cause notice is hereby set aside.
ii. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Author Bio
