Follow Us :

The journey that started almost 29 years ago with the prime objective of investor protection and development and regulation of securities market here, Indian securities market and SEBI have grown from year to year, and this market experienced a drastic shift from merit based regulatory system to market oriented based disclosures regime.

In this timeline, SEBI has tried to incorporate various global and internationally acclaimed principles within its regulation which has constantly enhanced the efficiency and integrity in securities market here and catapulted it into a global platform.

A) Types of Unfair Offences where SEBI took the charge in its own hand:

  • Scalping: A trading which specializes in taking profits on small price changes soon after a trade has been entered into and has become profitable. E.g. Harshad Mehta scam.
  • Puffing Advertisements / Rumour Fraud: The best e.g. of Surana Solar Ltd., wherein a person through an already established name, here ‘Rakesh Jhunjhunwala’, created frenzy in the market, by purchasing chunk of the company’s shares in Rakesh’s name, also called ‘The Badshah of Dalal Street’, and because of which after price reached high, he dumped the stock and take back profits.
  • Front Running: An unethical practice wherein a broker having an advanced knowledge of pending orders trades through his personal account, thereby stepping ahead of orders yet to be placed.
  • Circular Trading: A fraudulent practice wherein a broker enters into sell order knowing that by offsetting buy orders, the same number of shares at same price will be or have been entered. E.g. Ketan Parekh Scam.
  • Churning and Burning: A practice wherein brokers increase their commission by performing large number of trades through his client’s name.
  • Pump and Dump: Attempting to increase share price through recommendations based on false and misleading statements.[1]
  • Ponzi Schemes: Working through enregistered CIS. E.g. Sahara, Sharda Chit Fund scam, etc.

B) Regulatory provisions for investigating Insider Trading and Market Abuse:

SEBI expressly prohibits an ‘Insider’ from dealing in securities market either directly or indirectly, when having with him ‘UPSI’. SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations of 1992 have been enacted under Sec.30 of 1992 Act and are intended to curb insider trading in securities. And Share Dealing Code is an addition to it which restricts the directors and other employees of a company from dealing in their securities on basis of UPSI available to them because of their respective position.

Similarly SEBI also enacted PFUTP (Prohibition  of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations and SAST (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations in place.

SEBI has the power of a civil court for examination of documents or witnesses, and apart from this it can also, either during or after the investigation/ inquiry, in the interest of investors can:

1. Suspend the trading in a security on recognized stock exchange.

2. Restrict any person from dealing in securities market.

3. Suspend any office bearer of a recognized stock exchange or an organization from holding such position.

4. Direct any intermediary or any person associated with securities market to not to dispose of such assets forming part of a transaction which is under investigation.

5. Appoint one or more officers to inspect the books of accounts of Insider or his associates.

6. Can also appoint a qualified auditor for detailed investigation of books of that insider, and many such powers.[2]

Insiders who violates such regulations are liable upto Rs. 25 Cr or 3 times the amount of profit gained, whichever is higher.[3] No doubt that SEBI since its inception have been taking the cases seriously and has involved in active adjudicatory proceedings and its related mechanism for levying monetary penalty and sending the concerned behind bars, but when it especially comes to investigation and inspection part, what more is further expected from this watchdog is to increase risk awareness and improve its risk assessment, and go for re-defining the monetary penalties to make this framework more effective.

[1] Report Of Joint Parliamentary Committee On Stock Market Scams And Matters Relating Thereto (Lok Sabha Secretariat 2021)<https://watchoutinvestors.com/JPC_REPORT.PDF>

[2] SEBI Act 1992.

[3] Ibid

******

Disclaimer:- The entire contents of this document have been prepared on the basis of relevant provisions and rules and as per the information existing at the time of the preparation. Although care has been taken to ensure the accuracy, completeness and reliability of the information provided, I assume no responsibility therefore. Users of this information are expected to refer to the relevant existing provisions of applicable Laws. The user of the information agrees that the information is not a professional advice and is subject to change without notice. I assume no responsibility for the consequences of use of such information.

Tags:

Author Bio

I am Shubham from Batch 2016-21 of GNLU. I have completed 5 years of integrated BA LLB course from GNLU, Gandhinagar, and I have completed Company Secretary Course meanwhile with 3rd Rank in Ahmedabad, Gujarat in CS Professional. I am a keen reader and enthusiastic listener of Corporate and Contract View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pledge under Indian Contract Act of 1872 – A quick recap All about Indemnity and Guarantee under Indian Contract Act of 1872 Duties of an Agent under Indian Contract Act of 1872 Procedure for appointing directors by small shareholders DIN Application and Allotment – Complete Procedure View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
April 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930