Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Sainath Enterprises Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Third Member)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 189/Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/11/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 2008
Courts : All ITAT (7439) ITAT Mumbai (2135)

M/s Sainath Enterprises Vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Third Member)

This reference under Section 255(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arises the difference which arises in the opinion of two Hon’ble Members with the above appeals.

2. This reference has been put up before me on the questions, which do not arise for determination. It is undisputed that the assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him, which was declined by the learned Accountant Member on the ground that it should be listed together with the appeal filed by the department. I do not find this to be a cogent reason for declining the prayer of the appellant- assessee. It is now well settled that a petitioner / plaintiff is the dominus litis and it is open to him to pursue or abandon his case. Withdrawal cannot be denied except when the person making the prayer has obtained some advantage / benefit, which he seeks to retain. In the present case, I do not find any such situation. The prayer made by the assessee is also not opposed by the Department. In the circumstances, the prayer made by the assessee for withdrawal of appeal is granted and appeal will be dismissed, as withdrawn. The appeal filed by the department is listed immediately for disposal in the regular bench.

Order pronounced in the Open Court.

Download Judgment/Order

Author Bio

Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Taxguru Consultancy / Taxguru Edu
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN
Member Since: 27 Feb 2017 | Total Posts: 854
A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

More Under Income Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

November 2020