Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kavya Saurabh Rastogi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Kavya Saurabh Rastogi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Delhi ITAT dismissed Assessee’s appeal & upheld the addition of ₹25.35 lakh as unexplained investment u/s 69, holding that Assessee failed to establish the creditworthiness of his mother & sister, from whom loans were allegedly taken for purchase of a residential house.

Assessee, engaged in trading, had declared income of ₹3.47 lakh. Based on AIR data, AO noticed sale of a plot for ₹32.66 lakh & purchase of a house for ₹35 lakh. Though capital gains exemption u/s 54 was allowed, AO added ₹25.35 lakh as unexpla

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Ex-Parte Order Quashed Due to Illness Preventing Timely Compliance Bogus Purchase Disallowance Held in Abeyance Due to HC Pending Cases Order Set Aside as CIT(A) Relied on Additional Evidence Without Remand Report Addition Deleted as Based Solely on Unverified Third-Party Information Without Evidence Linking Assessee Delayed Form 10B is Curable Procedural Lapse: ITAT Ahmedabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031