Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Usha Rani (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Usha Rani (ITAT Delhi) Tribunal Protects Woman Assessee: No Burden to Prove Creditworthiness of Husband & Sons: Property Investment by Senior Citizen- AO’s Addition Quashed – Family Contributions for Property Accepted as Genuine- ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs.1.10 Cr Addition Revenue appealed against order of CIT(A) deleting addition of Rs.1,10,25,000/- made u/s 69 on account of unexplained investment in property. AO reopened assessment based on AIR information that Usha Rani, a senior citizen, purchased property for Rs.1,05,00,000/- (her share) plus Rs.5,25,000/- stamp duty. AO held t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930