Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs J.B. Eng. Works (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Income Tax (Appeal) No. 616 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/10/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the Case

ITAT Mumbai held In the case of DCIT vs. J.B. Eng. Works that that the assessee had transferred independent interests in two different assets and therefore the Capital Gains arising on the assignment of leasehold interest in the land being a capital asset was rightly offered for tax as Long Term Capital Gains and the consideration attributable to the transfer of the building was rightly offered for tax as Short Term Capital Gains u/s 50. No interference is called for therein and therefore same are upheld.

Facts of the Case

Addition on account of sale of land

During the course of assessment proceedings it wasfound by the AO that main source of income of the assessee during the year was on account of sale of factory building located at Andheri (E), Mumbai. This amount was credited to the P & L Account. However, in the computation of income filed along with return of income, the assessee showed the income as Long Term Capital Gains and offered it for taxation. The Capital Gain was shown to have arisen from sale of land. The sale consideration was declared at Rs.1,50,00,000/- and the entire amount was offered as Long Term Capital Gains.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031