Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Rakesh Jain, (Punjab and Hariyana High Court at Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 380 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/02/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tippers, vibrator & vibrator soil compactor are ‘commercial vehicle’ eligible for 40% depreciation 

Perusal of Section 32 of the Act would show that it deals with the depreciation of building, machinery, plant or furniture being tangible assets. It also deals with the expression  ‘commercial vehicle’ in unnumbered proviso 3, which is acquired by the assessee on or after the 1st day of October, 1998 but before the 1st day of April 1999. According to explanation, the commercial vehicle is to include heavy goods vehicle, heavy passenger motor vehicle, light motor vehicle, medium goods vehicle but is not to include maxi-cab, motor-cab, tractor and road-roller.

Therefore, the question which falls for consideration is whether Tippers, Vibrator and Vibrator Soil Compactor would be covered by the expression ‘commercial vehicle’ or such vehicles have to be regarded as plant and machinery to attract less percentage of depreciation. The reasoning adopted by the Tribunal would not suffer from any legal infirmity because the Tippers are registered under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity ‘the 1988 Act’) as road transport vehicle as would be vibrator and vibrator soil compactor. Insofar as Tippers are concerned, a Division Bench of the Karntaka High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax v. Mahalinga Setty & Co. (1992) 195 ITR 526 (KAR) has opined against the revenue by giving the benefit of investment allowance to the assessee . If that be so then Vibrator and the Vibrator Soil Compactor would follow the suit because the reasoning adopted is that the vehicles are registered under the 1998 Act and it is essential machinery to carry on the construction work.

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

1. ITA No. 380 of 2011 Date of Decision: February 21, 2012

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031