Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahendra Manilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mahendra Manilal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Addition based only on third-party statement sent back: ITAT restores appeal to CIT(A) for fresh decision Ahmedabad  ITAT set aside the order of the CIT(A), NFAC, and restored the matter to the file of the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The dispute related to an addition of ₹63.75 lakh, which was confirmed by the CIT(A) on the basis of a third-party statement, without any independent material brought on record to establish that the Assessee had made any unexplained cash payment. The Assessee contended that the addition was made without dischar...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031